Daniel Clark

@clarkdaniel.bsky.social

Phd-ing in political theory (oppression, old age, and the thought of Iris Marion Young) Core team member, Open Justice Court of Protection Project @openjusticecop.bsky.social

The judge in this hearing was full of praise for P's social worker, and I thought it was worth highlighting. In the event I need a social worker fighting my corner, I hope it's someone like this

Open Justice Court of Protection Project@openjusticecop.bsky.social · 2y ago

New blog post by @clarkdaniel.bsky.social DJ Weir thanks a Sheffield City Council social worker for her "enthusiasm and passion" #OpenJustice #NotSecretCourt openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2025/04/04/d...

@thesmallplaces.bsky.social points out that the public bodies making best interests decision, rather than XY's mum (who's also his Health and Welfare) deputy), "seems like an example of bureaucratic overreach". Have a read - it's some really interesting commentary

Open Justice Court of Protection Project@openjusticecop.bsky.social · 2y ago

New blog post by Daniel Clark @clarkdaniel.bsky.social and Claire Martin @doccmartin.bsky.social (with commentary by Lucy Series @thesmallplaces.bsky.social) openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2025/02/27/a...

Last October I was in London to investigate how accessible (or not) two court buildings are. First Avenue House fared much better than the Royal Courts of Justice but both were plagued by small text on signs. Even a notice that said you could ask for documents in large print were in small print!

Open Justice Court of Protection Project@openjusticecop.bsky.social · 2y ago

A report on the accessibility of the Court of Protection in London. Inaccessible courts are bad for the public, bad for lawyers, and bad for the judiciary. @clarkdaniel.bsky.social identifies ways to improve accessibility in two court buildings openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2025/02/17/a...

An interesting post. I’m not really sure what the solution is to the problems with the Royal Courts of Justice. Ever since the building opened, people have been making (well-founded) jokes about it being a maze. It was even mentioned in the LCJ’s opening speech. Or this example from later in 1883.

Screenshot reading:

It was reported that the Petitioner and Respondent in a Divorce Suit, after wandering about for some time, met accidentally in a corridor, and, inquiring of each other the way to the Court they were seeking, mutual recognition followed, and they became happily reconciled.
Open Justice Court of Protection Project@openjusticecop.bsky.social · 2y ago

A report on the accessibility of the Court of Protection in London. Inaccessible courts are bad for the public, bad for lawyers, and bad for the judiciary. @clarkdaniel.bsky.social identifies ways to improve accessibility in two court buildings openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2025/02/17/a...

I'm a little late to reading this but it was worth the wait. It's an excellent book that rigorously pursues the evidence of Heidegger's commitment to Nazism. There's also engagement with Hannah Arendt's analysis of Heidegger without the unnecessary references to their relationship that others make

The title page of Richard Wolin's 'Heidegger in Ruins: Between Philosophy and Ideology"

As Celia says here, it's now very rare to see a journalist in Court of Protection hearings. When they are there, they often don't address the court or report on proceedings. That leaves it up to the public to 'fly the flag' of transparency: something that "can feel like a disproportionate burden"

Celia Kitzinger@kitzingercelia.bsky.social · 2y ago

My new blog post about yet another committal hearing - there was a run of them before Xmas openjusticecourtofprotection.org/2025/01/03/a...

Been thinking about this since I read it yesterday. Arrogance, confidence and intrenched positions; alongside the blind belief of those who work for the state (especially local authority/NHS staff). A heady combination, which often results in deathly consequences (literally, not hyperbole).

Oliver Conway@oliverconway.bsky.social · 2y ago

Dissertations could be written about LA structures with this judgment. These children deserved so much better. This judgment also includes the immortal line “Their incoherence and recalcitrance in their written and oral evidence was astonishing to witness.” www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWF...