Daniel Loxton 🇨🇦

@danielloxton.bsky.social

Author, illustrator, and researcher of misinformation and fringe claims. Former Editor (2002–2021) of Junior Skeptic, and author of Evolution: How We and All Living Things Came to Be and other science books for kids and adults. https://www.danielloxton.com

Procrastinating painting more tedious foreground grass today, but I’m gonna have to start eventually. (I’ve never had that much luck isolating grass from photos as base coat elements, though I’ve tried at various times over the years, including the last few days)

#AI #LLM Something I've not seen commented on is the explosion of bot-impeding pages (e.g., via Cloudflare) that now appear before web pages load. The cumulative time waste for human users has got to be in the billions of person-hours. An immense burden imposed on everyone by the AI-bro assholes.

Bild

"Pastors in Name Only" "Wicked Witch of Woke" “I've never seen anyone commit so much blasphemy against the word of God." As pastors become Democratic nominees — at least 5 so far, and likely one more tonight — their Republican opponents are attacking their faith. religionnews.com/2026/08/04/p...

'They're not real pastors': As clergy run as Democrats, Republicans question their faith

(RNS) — 'It's a sign that they are really scared they're gonna lose this seat,' the Rev. Sarah Trone Garriott, a Lutheran pastor running for Congress in Iowa, said. She is part of a wave of religious ...

religionnews.com

I’m gonna be rolling my eyes till I die over being accused of wasting time on “skepticism from 30,000 feet” for asking things like “What are we even trying to do here? How will we do that? Who will do what things, exactly? Who will support us doing them? Do we have the resources to accomplish that?”

“The most important discomfort that powerful people experience is having ego-shattering conflicts with subordinates who know how to do things they do not know how to do.” From experience: Business Idiots do not like fundamental questions they comically cannot answer about the thing they run

Steve B@steveb.wsocial.eu · yesterday

Must-read essential level insight from Cory @doctorow.pluralistic.net for @thenerve.news: 'This has created a situation in which everyone – "boards, executives, employees, vendors, consultants" – has a strong incentive to lie about how much AI is delivering for their companies.'

6th #WIP of this digital #paleoart painting… Fussing about with the unfinished foreground elements. The logic of the scene kinda demands obscuring the feet, and I'm not willing to, so it's taking some fudging I'm not happy with yet. We're into the final third or so of work on the piece though

Work in progress digital painting of an extinct, antlered giraffe-relative, full body profile against green landscape and blue sky

Pretty much no one in my art school thought they’d be making a steady living from fine art or even commercial decorative painting. (I know a rare few who did though.) Art school’s a feeder stream out to graphic design, advertising, architecture, publishing, photography, jewelry, all kinds of stuff

The New Republic@newrepublic.com · 2d ago

President Trump is banning students majoring in degrees that don’t make enough money from taking out college loans. Degrees for social work, art, religious studies, teaching aides, and music will be hit the hardest. trib.al/aaAEu6v

If you think of yourself as someone who “can’t draw,” you could probably learn to draw much better than you imagine. Talent’s a real thing, or rather a few things—not all even relevant! Like, not everyone can win the Boston marathon, but who cares? Ordinary talent is mostly just a drive to practice

Brooke@brooklynmarie.bsky.social · 3d ago

Yes!!!! I learn best by reading and doing so if you are like me these three books might be very helpful: The Art of Drawing: The Complete Course (no author listed, but the publisher is listed as Sterling) Rendering in Pen and Ink (by Arthur L. Guptill) What It Is (by Lynda Barry)

Out of curiosity, I took a look at our mutual former publication's homepage and I'm sure you'll be < "Shocked, shocked!" gif > surprised to know that it's now a Superfund site of AI slop, lol.

“Fantasy of the Optional Pandemic” is a phrase I might keep in mind. It was maddening hearing GBD-type arguments that widespread transmission would be just fine with focused protection of the vulnerable. We were already trying and failing to protect the vulnerable even with constrained transmission!

Jonathan Howard@joho.bsky.social · 4d ago

This is what I mean when I talk about the Fantasy of the Optional Pandemic, where the virus was erased from the equation and mitigation measures were always portrayed as an avoidable choice. Headlines about what actually happened are never even acknowledged.

The "Now we know the market was not the source, it was the amplifier" gotcha quote from Fauci's January 26, 2020 journal entry is really misleading (as well as being stripped from its context from the very fluid early days of an emerging situation).

Text reading "quarantining for a period of time even asymptomatic people who arrive from Wuhan. It now appears using epi data and genomic data that the first infection was in early December and was not connected to the market. The infections spread among people weeks before the Chinese reported that they were dealing with a new infection and that gave the virus time to establish itself in multigenerational (sustained) spread. Remember, early on the Chinese were saying that there is no human to human transmission and all the original 27 cases were from the market. Now we know the market was not the source, it was the amplifier. Having said that, somewhere the virus jumped from animals to humans."

“Fantasy of the Optional Pandemic” is a phrase I might keep in mind. It was maddening hearing GBD-type arguments that widespread transmission would be just fine with focused protection of the vulnerable. We were already trying and failing to protect the vulnerable even with constrained transmission!

Jonathan Howard@joho.bsky.social · 4d ago

This is what I mean when I talk about the Fantasy of the Optional Pandemic, where the virus was erased from the equation and mitigation measures were always portrayed as an avoidable choice. Headlines about what actually happened are never even acknowledged.

Posner tries to make gotcha hay from the 6 feet or 2m Covid social distancing standard “was never tested at all.” That number always seemed arbitrary to me. No one knew exactly how Covid transmitted! It’s just “keep some distance” expressed as an easy to remember equivalent of a body length or so

Daniel Loxton 🇨🇦@danielloxton.bsky.social · 4d ago

Posner seems to have gotten pretty conspiratorial somewhere along the way. Here his article claims only 2 of 12 virologists on a Feb 1 conference call "believed a natural origin was likely.” Those 2 instead thought "we should not waste our time and divert effort" investigating "deliberate insertion"

The "Now we know the market was not the source, it was the amplifier" gotcha quote from Fauci's January 26, 2020 journal entry is really misleading (as well as being stripped from its context from the very fluid early days of an emerging situation).

Text reading "quarantining for a period of time even asymptomatic people who arrive from Wuhan. It now appears using epi data and genomic data that the first infection was in early December and was not connected to the market. The infections spread among people weeks before the Chinese reported that they were dealing with a new infection and that gave the virus time to establish itself in multigenerational (sustained) spread. Remember, early on the Chinese were saying that there is no human to human transmission and all the original 27 cases were from the market. Now we know the market was not the source, it was the amplifier. Having said that, somewhere the virus jumped from animals to humans."

My favorite research success story, the moral of which is: always be nosey. I am writing on a subject on which everyone cites a prize-winning MA thesis that seems to be *un-gettable.* I contacted the archivist at the university where the thesis was written, and they got nothing. 1/6