Dichromat Chloe (4% of scientists)

@dichromat-chloe.bsky.social

Advocating for color accessibility in scientific figures. 4% of scientists are colorblind.

Having a color-blind colleague is a good reminder that we need to be more careful when designing figures for scientific publication 🧪 My lab has found this page especially useful for selecting color palettes, used in combination with different symbols: thenode.biologists.com/data-visuali...

Color blind friendly palettes for data visualizations with categories

A discussion of color blind friendly palettes for labeling unique catergories in data visualization.

thenode.biologists.com

Public Service Announcement: Check colorblind-compatibility in Illustrator! Under 'View', 'Proof Setup' you can selected a colorblindness type to view your image in that spectra. Click 'Proof Colors' after to remove filter. We chose pink/green, yellow/blue here for accessibility (PMID 38112643).

Screen capture of an Adobe Illustrator window in standard viewing mode (that is, without colorblind filter applied).Screen capture of an Adobe Illustrator window with 'View' menu pulled down, showing selection of a relevant colorblindness filter being applied.Screen capture of an Adobe Illustrator window with the previous image in a protanopia-type colorblindness mode applied.
Dichromat Chloe (4% of scientists)@dichromat-chloe.bsky.social · 2y ago

(please amplify) 4% of scientists face an important barrier to an the ENTIRE FIELD of single-cell genomics and here is why

For the remaining 96% who are curious, here is the direct comparison. Minor difference in full spectrum view, major difference in protanopia and deuteranopia view. See alt text for Photoshop instructions.

Comparison of red-green and red-magenta color scheme of embryo screenshot from video in this thread, comparing full spectrum view and simulated protanopia and deuteranopia colorblindness.  For Photoshop users: Go to View -> Proof Setup -> Color Blindness to preview your figure in these modes.