Marios Richards

@mariosrichards.bsky.social

Frequently wrong. Please correct (effort involved appreciated). Experiments with Data Visualisation: https://github.com/MariosRichards/BES_analysis_code https://medium.com/@mariosrichards https://mariosrichards.substack.com/

Apparently someone thought the Robocop franchise appropriate to base not one but *two* animated children's cartoon series in. Haven't felt this level of dissonance since I watched a Transformers movie - family rating - and watched one robot tear out the spine of another robot and beat it with it.

Listening to a podcast talking to Gen Z MP (Rest is Politics) - just as an aside one MP mentioned a friend using their inheritance to help pay off their UK student loan. Nobody in the interview pointed out that this would - in almost any combination of circumstances - be financial self-harm.

Reform voters, and to a lesser extent Tories, are much likelier to think they hold the most common public view across several topics that our survey suggests is not the case, most notably: -2024 rioters -Trans ID -Bregret -Business reg -Lockdowns -Israel-Palestine -Trump yougov.com/en-gb/articl...

Bild

The 2024 US Presidential election was heralded as a “vibe shift” with public support swinging away from content moderation and towards freedom of speech. However, the pundits were wrong! In a new study we found that the so-called vibe shift in societal norms was largely an illusion.

Bild

This book - at least the chapter 1 very tight summary of arguments/contents available in tweet below this one - is very good! Explicit norms based model of some of the stuff I've been waffling around (RR voting can shoot up *without an economic driver/without an attitudinal shift in its favour*).

Rob Ford@robfordmancs.bsky.social · 2mo ago

For more on the power of norms to shape political behaviour, check out this book by @valentimvicente.bsky.social which really should be required reading for every British politician and advisor, and everyone in the British political media: academic.oup.com/book/57946

Re: Nathan Cofnas - seeing a lot of arguments posed as defending "academic freedom"... ...which on inspection aren't about academic freedom but instead just vanilla "post-doc hired to clean business management datasets publicly asserts that vaccines don't work and that that's what he's working on".

Academic Freedom != Unqualified Free Speech (phil postdoc contracted to write about liberalism can assert that vaccines don't work *both consequence free and be quoted as speaking with the authority of their academic post*)

Re: Clacton By-election - keep hearing people present "well, he might have consolidated his vote in Clacton, it go even higher" ... as if that matters. If Nigel Farage spends has to fight another by-election in Clacton - this time because of the thing he was trying to dodge ...

More basic than the moral quandary presented is the fact that it's imaginary. If someone says "rape 50 children or the planet blows up" ... before you start arguing consequentialism vs deontology, question 1 should be "Why do you believe these things are connected? What is the model in your head?".

Matthew Noe@noethematt.bsky.social · last mo.

If the options are save the country by sacrificing an entire group of people or don't save the country... We've already lost and the country isn't worth saving

It's a genuine gift to see an MP reasoning outloud in public with a Labour activist. The downside is that you can see the vast gaps in the chain of reasoning.

Jonathan Portes@jdportes.bsky.social · 2mo ago

I genuinely don't understand how @antoniabance.bsky.social gets from "I don't need mad speeches from the PM about strangers" [top] to "I'm broadly fine with [forced remigration of 100,000s of people who came here legally to work]" [bottom] ..which was the "mad speech about strangers" policy..