Samantha Dalal

@samanthadalal.bsky.social

**On the job market!** InfoSci PhD Candidate @ CU Boulder MSR SMC '23; MSR TAIX '24 Community-based methods for tech accountability

With respect to the researchers' claims that the "the potential benefits of this research substantially outweigh its risks," it seems to mostly rely on "warning call" benefits. I am personally not a fan of "we need to do harm to show that harm can be done" ethical justifications.

They're called public records for a reason. Starting today, WIRED will *stop paywalling* articles that are primarily based on public records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, becoming the first publication to partner with @freedom.press to offer this for our new coverage.

Wired is dropping paywalls for FOIA-based reporting. Others should follow

As the administration does its best to hide public records from the public, Wired magazine is stepping up to help stem the secrecy

freedom.press

"Instead, to advance justice, we must radically transform not just the technology itself, but our ideas about it, and develop it from the bottom up, from the perspectives of those who stand the most risk of being harmed."

Charles Logan@charleswlogan.bsky.social · last yr.

Speaking of AI Empire: it's always a good time revisit this @bigdatasoc.bsky.social open article by Jasmina Tacheva and Srividya Ramasubramanian available at: journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1...

A screenshot of the article "AI Empire: Unraveling the interlocking
systems of oppression in generative AI’s global order" by Jasmina Tacheva and Srividya Ramasubramanian.

This is one of the most basic insights from 20th century polisci. The paradox of a democracy that presumes mass knowledge and participation, and manages to (at least barely) function in their absence, is one of our foundational puzzles. This is intro-level shit. And Balaji is failing the test.

Since some seem determined not to get it: Arguing science shouldn’t be political is like arguing that ducks shouldn’t be waterfowl. Sure, whatever floats your boat, but they wouldn’t be ducks then would they? Science is a collective human effort at sensemaking—the very definition of political.

Carl T. Bergstrom@carlbergstrom.com · 2y ago

When I was 5, I loved science, which I took to be planets and magnets and chemicals and shit. Soon I realized science was a collective human activity, and these were just the objects of its attention. Anyway, whenever I read an OpEd on how science isn't political, I think "Are you 5 years old?"

Hi Friends <3 making my bluesky debut in the best way possible - with a new paper announcement! I had the privilege to work with Nari Johnson & Siobhan Mackenzie Hall on a NeurIPS EvalEval paper interrogating the promised benefits of participation in AI dev to socially marginalized communities 🧵

We map the dependencies that often exist between key stakeholder groups: (1) members of marginalized communities, (2) other social actors who use GenAI tools, and (3) institutions (such as private technology companies or academic universities) that develop GenAI models, in participatory engagements to improve how marginalized communities are represented by GenAI.