Ira Hyman

@irahyman.bsky.social

Professor of Psychology; Rider of Bicycles; Seeker of Justice. Applied cognitive psychologist, studying attention & memory, some disinfo too. (He/him; 1st gen college student). With maybe some pictures of Cookie the bernedoodle.

Starting a thread for our rapid research into election rumors today (Mon Nov 2). We're currently getting our team ready for tomorrow, but we have a few stories that we're tracking now, including one from Maricopa County (a repeat focus of rumors and conspiracy theories about election integrity).

1. Major news outlets who did not report on the new rape allegation against Trump: The New York Times The Washington Post The Wall Street Journal ABC News CBS News CNN NPR PBS News Business Insider Axios The Associated Press Bloomberg The Atlantic Reuters NBC News Politico (con't)

I don’t really think “not a politician” should be a selling point for a candidate. The job is politician. I want to elect someone who understands that job and is good at it and also is not a dirtbag. We have seen how catastrophic it is to make “not a politician” the priority over “not a dirtbag.”

Voting, for democrats, will help you live longer. More access to healthcare Support for rural hospitals Access to vaccines Clean air and water Inspections of food safety Tracking of pandemics Warnings of weather events The list is longer, but your life is on the ballot. @standupforscience.net

CNN@cnn.com · 10h ago

Happiness, altruism, optimism, social connection and a sense of belonging and purpose all have been linked with longevity in previous studies. And the American Medical Association has acknowledged voting as a social determinant of health. https://cnn.it/4BWAv9d

What’s your guess on the number of senate races in which republicans file lawsuits after they lose? Forget predicting the outcome of elections. The goal of the disinformation campaign has been to set the stage for contesting their loses. Check the great work by @katestarbird.bsky.social et al.

The magical Halloween to Christmas moment! I caught the transition at our local grocery store. They were trading out the Halloween candy for Christmas candy this afternoon. All I want for Christmas is you will soon be playing on the sound system.

BildBildBild

If you say this out loud on here of course, a number of reporters and opinion writers from the New York Times sometimes show up in your mentions to tell you how unfair you're being. They know who the real victim is here: the New York Times. The publication has gotten very weird.

Jamison Foser@jamisonfoser.bsky.social · 3d ago

I wrote about the New York Times’ multimedia full-court press on the dumb Alaska story — a dozen print, video, audio, and newsletter reports at last count — and the news media’s responsibility to cover things in proportion to their importance. www.findinggravity.net/the-new-york...

At this writing, the New York Times has now run more than a dozen reports on this matter in just three days. The Times is in the kind of full-court press mode it saves for things like Joe Biden stumbling over his words. By my tally, the alleged Peltola maneuver has been a primary subject of six New York Times articles, four New York Times newsletters, a New York Times podcast, a New York Times video, and two letters to the editor the New York Times chose to run. At least nine New York Times journalists have bylines on these pieces. I can only imagine what the Sunday crossword puzzle has in store for us.1
Meanwhile, the New York Times still has not told readers of a new rape allegation against Donald Trump that was made public on Monday in a report the New York Times dishonestly dismissed on grounds that “it largely cites allegations that have already been public.” The word “largely” is doing a awful lot of work in that sentence, given that the report includes a new rape allegation.

Our Election Rumor Rundown team has put out a lot of materials these past few weeks about election rumors. I can hardly keep up with them all. But here are a few highlights — and what we need to keep in mind going into Election Day (Tuesday) and what is likely to come after. [Thread]

I was part of a working group on AI and Fraternity assembled by the Vatican. We met in Rome and worked on this over two days. I am happy to share the result of that intense effort: a Declaration we presented to the Pope and other government authorities coexistence.global

BildIn this spirit of fraternity, hope and caution, we call upon your leadership to uphold the following principles and red lines to foster dialogue and reflection on how AI can best serve our entire human family:

    Human life and dignity: AI must never be developed or used in ways that threaten, diminish, or disqualify human life, dignity, or fundamental rights. Human intelligence – our capacity for wisdom, moral reasoning, and orientation toward truth and beauty – must never be devalued by artificial processing, however sophisticated. 

    AI must be used as a tool, not an authority: AI must remain under human control. Building uncontrollable systems or over-delegating decisions is morally unacceptable and must be legally prohibited. Therefore, development of superintelligence (as mentioned above) AI technologies should not be allowed until there is broad scientific consensus that it will be done safely and controllably, and there is clear and broad public consent.

    Accountability: only humans have moral and legal agency and AI systems are and must remain legal objects, never subjects. Responsibility and liability reside with developers, vendors, companies, deployers, users, institutes, and governments. AI cannot be granted legal personhood or “rights”. 

    Life-and-death decisions: AI systems must never be allowed to make life or death decisions, especially in military applications during armed conflict or peacetime, law enforcement, border control, healthcare or judicial decisions.
    Independent testing and adequate risk assessment must be required before deployment and throughout the entire lifecycle.
    Stewardship: Governments, corporations, and anyone else should not weaponize AI for any kind of domination, illegal wars of aggression, coercion, manipulation, social scoring, or unwarranted mass surveillance. 

    Responsible design: AI should be designed and independently evaluated to avoid unintentional and catastrophic effects on humans and society, for example through design giving rise to deception, delusion, addiction, or loss of autonomy.  

    No AI monopoly: the benefits of AI – economic, medical, scientific, social – should not be monopolized. 

    No Human Devaluation: design and deployment of AI should make humans flourish in their chosen pursuits, not render humanity redundant, disenfranchised, devalued or replaceable. 

    Ecological responsibility: our use of AI must not endanger our planet and ecosystems. Its vast demands for energy, water, and rare minerals must be managed responsibly and sustainably across the whole supply chain.

    No irresponsible global competition: We must avoid an irresponsible race between corporations and countries towards ever more powerful AI.

Important essay on how class gets defined in political discourse. Is it money or education and culture? Democrats can win with money argument. But risk it if they turn back to tech after the election. Dems must come down hard on the oligarchs and their data centers. www.nytimes.com/2026/10/31/o...

Opinion | Republicans Tried to Turn the Cheesecake Factory Against Democrats. It Flopped.

It’s become screamingly obvious who represents billionaires and unchecked plutocratic power.

nytimes.com