Trevor Aleo

@mraleosays.bsky.social

teacher | scholar | ENG & EDU lecturer | literary, critical, & postdigital #literacies

Also, if you have no money, academic zoom talks are still 💯 *invited talks* and that looks great on people's CVs! 💫 Many people will accept talks if you cover the costs, or even for free if it's online! People may do it for a parking pass and a sandwich lunch!

Only a few pages into @aarthivadde.bsky.social’s “We the Platform” & I’m excited it’s going to deepen my belief that we need alternate histories (both recent and distant) to rethink the present & chart a new future for the literary humanities. E.g. I loved how The Teaching Archive recast the

With the spate of new trade books about data politics & too late capitalism, I fear this one might be getting lost in the shuffle. As important as Big Tech & Silicon Valley VCs are, you can’t understand the present without attention to the restructuring of capital around fund managers after 2008.

Bild

In addition to the testing regimes causing this, the skill-i-fication of education offered us a way to rationalize it. The assumption being there are generic “writing skills that students strengthen like a muscle through use regardless of form/context” helped justify artificial forms of writing.

John Downes-Angus@johndownesangus.bsky.social · 3d ago

“Better to emphasize the quality of their arguments rather than the mechanics of sentences” started off as a neat idea and then bowdlerized writing instruction entirely

I can already see the Ed Reform forces marshaling. Stay tuned for more scripted curriculum based on The Science of Learning™️ & Long-Term-Memory-Maxxing™️ being pitched as The Solution®️ to all our educational problems. It’ll even come in progressive AND reactionary flavors!

Natalie Weiner@natalieweiner.bsky.social · 5d ago

“Education should be about exploration,” the letter reads. “We want to go to school to connect with people, discover things, and learn....We can’t now, because of the rigidity of the new lesson plans and rules makes it almost impossible to explore new ideas...”

AEI is also making inroads in K-12 education by resurrecting the zombified ed-reform corpse for the 800th time. This time they’ll go straight to struggling schools & sell them on traditional “common sense” pedagogy that’s aligned with their reactionary vision for HE. www.aei.org/the-practice...

aei.org

Asheesh Kapur Siddique@asheeshks.org · 7d ago

That all of these universities producing reports on what the future of higher ed should be are collaborating with the American Enterprise Institute is a tell that they see this moment of higher ed "reform" as an opportunity to entrench reactionary policies and undermine the humanities further.

Stuff like this has been happening a little too often on here lately. Piling on someone who is clearly an expert operating in good faith with a history of critical engagement of the topic under discussion is not the move. Can we not turn this site into a circular firing squad, please?

Zeb Larson@zeblarson.bsky.social · 7d ago

Reading the responses to this just make me despair. If on this text-based microblogging site people can’t be counted on to read beyond the strictly literal, I don’t know what to say. Josh’s point is clearly not an endorsement of AI but some people clearly just needed to post 3 more times today.

I think a lot of people jumping on this don’t know Josh’s area of expertise or background, this post is not about devaluing your critiques, or a “you participate in society” thing, it’s about how insidious ai is, it’s in so much of our tech that it’s becoming embedded in our information systems.

Post nicht verfügbar.

A couple people tagged me here. Thank you. Following the money is definitely a precept of my EdTech research. When it comes to Alpha, the trail is both obvious, & deceptively complex. The obvious part leads to Joe Liemandt, his software company (Trilogy) & investment firm (ESW Capital).

All Our Kids Will Go To Alpha School

On the plans to hyperscale Alpha School’s “AI” tutoring software to “a billion kids.”

theamericanvandal.com

Greg Pak@gregpak.net · 2w ago

i’d love to see someone follow the money on this one

I’m tired, ya’ll. We’re really about to do this whole thing again aren’t we? We’re really about to get sold another story aren’t we? This is seriously some hauntology, capitalist realism level stuff: “It is easier to envision the end of the world than the end of the literacy wars.” 🫠

Trevor Aleo@mraleosays.bsky.social · 2w ago

Haven’t people spent the last 5 years melting down about how we spent billions of dollars on a dated literacy program with scant supporting evidence that was owned & operated by an EduGuru & run like a cult of personality? Is it because this one has #Science on the box? time.com/article/2026...

The thing about SaS's breathless innuendo about the evil publishing company pushing a flawed product, the cultish devotion to a set of scholars invested in a particular way of understanding education, and widespread underdelivering is — that’s just what ed reform looks like. For decades.

Trevor Aleo@mraleosays.bsky.social · 2w ago

Haven’t people spent the last 5 years melting down about how we spent billions of dollars on a dated literacy program with scant supporting evidence that was owned & operated by an EduGuru & run like a cult of personality? Is it because this one has #Science on the box? time.com/article/2026...

I’m tired, ya’ll. We’re really about to do this whole thing again aren’t we? We’re really about to get sold another story aren’t we? This is seriously some hauntology, capitalist realism level stuff: “It is easier to envision the end of the world than the end of the literacy wars.” 🫠

Trevor Aleo@mraleosays.bsky.social · 2w ago

Haven’t people spent the last 5 years melting down about how we spent billions of dollars on a dated literacy program with scant supporting evidence that was owned & operated by an EduGuru & run like a cult of personality? Is it because this one has #Science on the box? time.com/article/2026...

There are many reasons to take issue with the NYT article making the rounds, but one of them is the fact it treats incredibly complex, abstract, & contested methods/approaches that require specialized training, implementation, etc. & treat them like they’re an app you install to make scores go 📈.

Jeffrey Austin@jaustinedu.bsky.social · 2w ago

The "Science of Reading" is so cost-effective that Michigan will spend over $100 million on the unproven, 100+ hour LETRS training for all elementary teachers in addition to providing tens of millions more for districts to buy dyslexia screeners and "SoR-aligned" curriculum from an approved list.

I don't disagree. But, as I wrote back to these reporters, I am most optimistic about projects that respond to the expressed concerns of students and teachers. These are the people who spend 180 days inside schools each year, and they're the key actors in the process of teaching and learning. 1/n

Matthew A Kraft@matthewakraft.com · 2w ago

New @nytimes.com piece ranks 30 education interventions on both effectiveness & costs. For me, the key takeaway is NOT about what academics (including myself) rated as most effective or least costly. It is about the decision making process districts use. 🧵 www.nytimes.com/2026/09/28/u...