Whatda... science is not intrinsically good. Scientists & scholars justified colonialism and slavery, they have justified austerity to benefit the rich, experimented on women without anesthesia or consent. Not all scientists ofc, but assuming that science focuses on the well-beinf of ppl... 1/
Andrea Reyes E (she/her)
@altibel.bsky.social
Self-funded PhD student (reading history in XVIII New Spain) & paid researcher (open science, research integrity) at Leiden University. Baking & reading aficionada. Managed by a Timneh. ORCID 0000-0002-5676-2122
This 👇🏽. We can be critical without resorting to racist, ableist, etc tropes. That type of thinking also acts as an obstacle for true solidarity across the board. We should not strive to maintain our rights but expand them.
I dislike the "what are we a bunch of Asians" when the Red Scare and Nazis did the same if not worse in cases. > At the extreme end of anti-intellectualism, we have the Cultural Revolution and the Khmer Rouge. But I agree that asserting AI is an unstoppable force is of course anti-intellectual.
Having long been aware of those tech bros who read my work as utopian porn, where they’ve taken that doesn’t exactly surprise me.
I hate Tom Cruise but I love Iñarritu and Berman so went to see #Digger and it is absolutely brilliant. I want to watch it again with PhDs and colleagues from the institute, and have a discussion about it afterwards.
"much less error prone than humans" is a fascinating comparison. What humans have you been "using"?
Excellent term, 12 points. From now on everybody pls make sure to update your glossary: lesser clerics.
like it does not matter whether anthropic's various lesser clerics (not dignifying these wankers with the term "engineer" any more) intended for it to do that. nothing about the nature of the systems or the intent of their deployment matters to the question of whether they're liable
“We’re now expected to either (1) check all this garbage that OAI is producing or (2) concede that all of these conjectures have been proven,” one algebraic topologist wrote to me. “I believe in politics this is known as ‘flooding the zone.’ We simply don’t have the resources to correct the record.”
New post on Transformation: Cracks appear in OpenAI’s wall of proofs https://www.quantamagazine.org/updates/transformation/#167798
over the past few weeks several AI evaluation/cybersecurity experts have explained how what's happening is a result of human incompetence rather than "AI going rogue". I'm begging the media to show a shred of journalistic integrity and stop parroting what altman or amodei say
An OpenAI system has gone rogue again – and it is the most panic-inducing yet
We and 120+ organisations across Europe are calling on our governments to cut ties with Palantir for good! @corporateeurope.org @epsu.bsky.social
This is why AGI isnt happening. Sense perception, movement, and memory are chemistries coupled to each other and all coupled to direct matter exchange with the environment, like a centrifugal governor. Nothing is representation, interpretation, “info processing”, or math.
We understand a scene because we can distinguish between the molecules and electromagnetic radiation within it. We can do that because we create molecules that REACT differently to everything in it. No one feeds us “training data“ about all the matter and energy in the universe
As an academic, it feels like some colleagues have lost the ability to engage deeply: they don't want to read an article unless it directly answers a question they already have... basically like using a chatbot they only want an answer to a current issue & not to actually learn anything or explore.
we have a policy for the use of genAI at the @aial.ie. we reflect on values key to scientific integrity, such as replicability, and err on the side of not using it blogpost: aial.ie/blog/gen-ai-... pdf: zenodo.org/records/2322...
At the @aial.ie, we collectively reflected and deliberated on the merits of the use of generative AI in research. Our collective statement and Lab Policy can be read here: aial.ie/blog/gen-ai-... zenodo.org/records/2322...
When someone told me a Canadian writer had won I was hoping it was Dionne Brand! Oh...
Spongebob Squarepants' Disappointed Reaction
Alt: Spongebob Squarepants smiles then it gets sad and disappointed
static.klipy.com
How come Wikipedia is doing better than academic publishing? Btw love that icon: 🚫🤖 🔗 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragmat...
Similar to (scientific) publishing: increase of shitty things produced > increase review time (wasting precious time), while ppl further deskill themselves cause "lifelong learning" + "technology = job security." The tech narrative is so powerful that ppl cannot imagine a different present & future.
Harvard just dropped a study AI productivity in software engineering and it found the average increase in productivity from using Claude code is.....zero and for exactly the reasons you'd think fion.ac/jellyfish.pdf
Found the email I sent when I got accidentally added to the faculty listserv of an orthopedic surgery clinic and nobody would remove me so I sent this email to all faculty/staff/med students and they removed me almost immediately
Reading student coursework that is written with an AI assist is annoying. And if I ever have to see the construct "this is not only X but also Y" again I might scream
Net gelezen in De Groene terwijl er vanuit de Utrecht-Gouda trein een heleboel boerenvlaggen op de velden te zien waren 🫠
📣 Nieuwe column voor @groene.nl - nog maar eens over de normalisering van uiterst rechts gedachtegoed. Directe aanleiding was het rapport van AIVD en NCTV over de strategische normalisering vanuit de rechts-extremistische beweging. 👇
Scientific American doing free marketing! Good to remember a point from the Leiden Declaration on Artificial Intelligence & Mathematics: "Results are attributable to specific authors who take credit for their discovery and assume responsibility for their correctness." leidendeclaration.ai
leidendeclaration.ai
🎯 and I'd also add to this strengthening and enforcing existing laws for product safety, fraudulent marketing, and non-discrimination
One way to slow down AI is to start strengthening and enforcing privacy laws. Even existing laws if interpreted wisely and enforced by regulators with a spine can make a difference.
Please don’t buy our books on Amazon. If you can’t afford to buy them from a real bookstore or from us directly, pirate them from Anna’s Archive like God intended.
Anti-Prime Day starts…NOW! 🥳 Today through midnight on 10/7, enjoy free shipping site-wide, all while supporting local, independent bookstores.
Univs & academics need to be aware of corporate tactics to influence frames through formal + informal collaborations w academic communities We covered this in a study with @solid-research.bsky.social, seminar on 16 Oct at 15:00 "What can universities learn from their ties with the tobacco industry?"
Toegang geblokkeerd / Access Blocked
universiteitleiden.nl
One of these OpenAI astroturfed events just happened here. The "Student Leads" of the event are receiving cash stipends. It is not a registered student organization. Unclear if compliant with the Campus Use of University Facilities policy, which normally prohibits commercial use of classrooms.
Replication as a rhetorical device is a terrible use of scientific resources. We need more curiosity, better methodology, and sounder theoretical grounding in metascience. This shtick of trying to have the last word on everything with poor methodology is going to turn it into a degenerate literature
The world does not consent (but Sam Altman does not believe consent is required). But the world would consent to many bad things happening to Sam Altman and OpenAI.
Sam Altman to Decoded: ‘The world should accept some bad things happening’ for the benefits of AI politi.co/4rJE8dI