Sergio Diaz

@sergiodiaz.bsky.social

π™€π™‘π™€π™‰π™π™Ž βž” π™˜π™€π™’π™žπ™£π™œ 𝙨𝙀𝙀𝙣 . . . βž” whoaaa i’m tabling again at a couple events later this month & in november !! i’m making all kinds of new prints & stickers for it ! i’ve got sweet revenge flyers to give out ! come see meeeeeee

COMIC ARTIST & AUTHOR VGE EVENTS COMING SOON...
AUTHOR OF COMICS SUCH AS YUMMY: A HISTORY OF DESSERTS, TASTY: A HISTORY OF YUMMY EXPERIMENTS, PLEASE BE MY STAR

SEPTEMBER 26 β€’ PFLUGERVILLE LIBRARYCON, 10am-6pm, libraryconvention.com

NOVEMBER 14 β€’ COMIC ARTS SAN ANTONIO, 10am - 5pm, comicarts-sa.com

out it goes: my long post about Rachel Hope Cleves's claim that Tillie Walden plagiarised her book. It's long because Cleves's claim is much, much more bizarre than it looked on first reading. I'm not going to bury the lede here. Cleves's claim does not hold up. buttondown.com/thene/archiv...

stick a pin in this metaphor

…because these covers are a microcosm of the entire conflict; Walden's book is mostly built on writing and other objects left by Sylvia Drake, Charity Bryant, and others. Her work includes many elements from these records that Cleves does not refer to in her book, and many of her interpretations of those records are different from Cleves's interpretations, often intentionally so. In addition to her historical basis, Walden's book includes fictional dialogue and story elements that are original to her work, some of which are inspired by Walden's own life.
thene@thene.bsky.social Β· 2mo ago

i am working on a very, very long blog post that could really have fit into a skeet: When someone posts that "this website/journal article/etc proves my dramatic claim!!!" and then does not link to the website, journal article, etc, it is because it does not in fact prove their dramatic claim.