Shenhav Lab

@shenhavlab.bsky.social

Neuroscience of motivation, decision making, and cognitive control shenhavlab.org

Check out our newest preprint, led by @sheensu.bsky.social and with @jasonleng.bsky.social, on when and why people choose to put off choosing! ⚖️🗓️ osf.io/preprints/ps... Sheen summarizes the excellent work in the 🧵 below:

@sheensu.bsky.social · 2d ago

New Preprint Alert! With @jasonleng.bsky.social @ashenhav.bsky.social @shenhavlab.bsky.social “Characterizing the causes, dynamics, and consequences of choice deferral” osf.io/preprints/ps... 🧵🧵🧵

Come see our work @affectscience.bsky.social! 😁 P2.S.207: “How Anticipated Feelings Guide Goal Prioritization Insights from an Inventory of Daily Goals” by Skylar Brooks 😁 P3.A.243: “Decision Goals Shape the Integration of Affective and Perceptual Information about our Options” by Ana Hernandez

Check out Sheen's brilliant work!! Born out of the 2024 election season, this is a rare example of a paper that takes you from new insight about mechanisms (how we decide) to meaningful real-world applications (voter turnout & polling). 🗳️ I sing its praises here: www.youtube.com/watch?v=zeHg...

How to make a choice when the options suck | Amitai Shenhav | TEDxNewEngland

YouTube video by TEDx Talks

youtube.com

@sheensu.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Excited to share my first PhD paper with @ashenhav.bsky.social @shenhavlab.bsky.social “Rejection-based choices discourage people from opting out of voting.” www.nature.com/articles/s41...

If you’ve been taught to think of decisions as a tug-of-war 🪢 (e.g., DDM), our new chapter will try to convince you otherwise! We show that these models miss key aspects of traditional choices, & prevent us from understanding non-traditional ones (e.g., whether/when/how many to choose). 🔗 below:

Jason Leng@jasonleng.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Excited to share our chapter "Breaking the Tug-of-War: What Neuroeconomics Can Gain by Moving Past Competition-Only Models" with Yi-Hsin Su, Romy Frömer, and @ashenhav.bsky.social, now out in the new volume, "Neuroeconomics: Core Topics and Current Directions"! doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-02925-6_10

Our latest paper, spearheaded by @hritz.bsky.social and Romy Frömer, is now out in Communications Psychology!! 🎉🎉 www.nature.com/articles/s44... See Harrison's excellent 🧵 below to learn more about what we found:

Misspecified models create the appearance of adaptive control during value-based choice - Communications Psychology

In a new computational analysis of previous work, this study shows that a control-free mechanism better accounts for value-based decisions than an account that assumes top-down control invigorating th...

nature.com

Harrison Ritz@hritz.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Final paper of my PhD 🤗 www.nature.com/articles/s44... There is growing interest in how cognitive control may improve value-based decision making. However, we find that a recent paper overestimated the role of control in their task, leading to erroneous interpretations of dACC recordings.

New preprint led by Ivan Grahek! Shifting demands of daily life require constant adjustments in how we allocate cognitive resources. Here we show that slower transitions between different cognitive strategies limit cognitive flexibility across the lifespan: biorxiv.org/content/10.1... 🧵 A thread:

Slower transitions between control states lead to reductions in cognitive flexibility over the lifespan

Declines in cognitive flexibility are a hallmark of cognitive aging, but their causes remain elusive. Here, we examine a previously untested source of aging-related cognitive inflexibility, building o...

biorxiv.org

👉“Leveraging Continuous Psychophysics to Study Cognitive Control Allocation in Dynamic Environments” by Yihuan Dong (A117) 👉“The effect of acute stress on mental effort allocation across motivational contexts” by Tony El Nemer (A115) [2/2]

Attending #CNS2025? Check out the following posters! (A98, A115, A117) 👉“Decoding Cognitive Control Dynamics: Neural Evidence of Inertia in Cognitive Control Adjustments Following Goal Changes” by Ivan Grahek (A98) [1/2]

By @katherinejwu.com "The NIH... supported 99 percent of the drugs approved in the U.S. from 2010 to 2019. The agency has had a hand in “nearly all of our major medical breakthroughs over the past several decades,” The NIH is in a struggle for its (and our) lives. This is existential to America:

Inside the Collapse at NIH

Administration officials pressured NIH to avoid clear advice from the agency’s own lawyers to restart grant funding now.

theatlantic.com

Freezing out the NIH's funding means freezing out American innovation. Research into curing cancer, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's all delayed. And ultimately it won't just cost us advancements in life-saving research, it will cost us lives.

NIH funding cuts could have ‘devastating impact’ on medical advancements, Chicago researchers say

The National Institutes of Health under President Donald Trump announced this month that it was cutting payments covering overhead costs for research institutions that receive its grants.

wbez.org