Elifcan Celebi

@elifcan.bsky.social

Researching/teaching comparative social policy at DSPI, University of Oxford https://elifcancelebi.com

🎉 Our paper just won the 2025 Best Paper Prize at the ECPR General Conference (Public Policy Section)! Honoured to share this with @v-yilmaz.bsky.social The paper's core message: movements acting strategically under authoritarian pressure can still win social policy battles👇 doi.org/10.1111/psj....

<em>Policy Studies Journal</em> | PSO Public Policy Journal | Wiley Online Library

How did a pension movement construct its narrative around pension age, shaping its structure and content to influence policy change in an electoral autocracy? This article delves into the campaign of....

doi.org

I’ll be giving a talk in Dublin this Tuesday. Building on Dr Göçmen's early-2010s Türkiye research, we're tracking developments and extending the analysis to Hungary. The presentation will draw on a work in progress with @elifcan.bsky.social, Judit Keller, and Tünde Virag. Join us if interested.

Bild

229 million women live in the EU, and they all deserve safe, affordable abortion care. 1 million citizens have spoken, and so has the Parliament. It’s time for the Commission to act: make safe abortion access a reality across Europe NOW! ✊💜 action.wemove.eu/sign/2026-02...

Safe abortion care for all women

229 million women live in the EU, and they all deserve safe, affordable abortion care. 1 million citizens have spoken, and so has the Parliament. It’s time for the Commission to act: make safe abortio...

action.wemove.eu

If you know Irish, Italian and/or Swedish citizens, please encourage them to sign this initiative and to disseminate! There is a need of a push for these countries, so they can reach their respective minimum thresholds.

samuel@quilombo.eurosky.social · 7mo ago

🚨 European Citizens' Initiative : Demand the full suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement in view of Israel’s violations of human rights. If you are an 🇪🇺 citizen you can now SIGN and disseminate! eci.ec.europa.eu/055/public/#...

The central argument in this excellent paper & thread is that the open-access turn has neglected profit; indeed, it turbo-charged publishers’ margins. As political economists who know a thing or two about profit and power we should speak up a lot more. As it says below: What we’re doing is crazy.

Mark A. Hanson@hansonmark.bsky.social · 9mo ago

We wrote the Strain on scientific publishing to highlight the problems of time & trust. With a fantastic group of co-authors, we present The Drain of Scientific Publishing: a 🧵 1/n Drain: arxiv.org/abs/2511.04820 Strain: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/... Oligopoly: direct.mit.edu/qss/article/...

A table showing profit margins of major publishers. A snippet of text related to this table is below.

1. The four-fold drain
1.1 Money
Currently, academic publishing is dominated by profit-oriented, multinational companies for
whom scientific knowledge is a commodity to be sold back to the academic community who
created it. The dominant four are Elsevier, Springer Nature, Wiley and Taylor & Francis,
which collectively generated over US$7.1 billion in revenue from journal publishing in 2024
alone, and over US$12 billion in profits between 2019 and 2024 (Table 1A). Their profit
margins have always been over 30% in the last five years, and for the largest publisher
(Elsevier) always over 37%.
Against many comparators, across many sectors, scientific publishing is one of the most
consistently profitable industries (Table S1). These financial arrangements make a substantial
difference to science budgets. In 2024, 46% of Elsevier revenues and 53% of Taylor &
Francis revenues were generated in North America, meaning that North American
researchers were charged over US$2.27 billion by just two for-profit publishers. The
Canadian research councils and the US National Science Foundation were allocated US$9.3
billion in that year.

New Sustainable Welfare post—a very short piece introducing some ideas from articles recently published in the area of post-growth. Growth is a fundamental part of capitalism, and transitioning to a post-growth economy requires learning how to transition to non-capitalist institutions.

Welfare without economic growth

In our daily lives we are constantly bombarded with news about advances in energy efficiency, the decarbonisation of the economy, and the possibility of growing without polluting. And yes, decarbon…

davidpalomera.com

“AI” isn’t a tool or technology or even a cluster of technologies with a misleading name. It’s the infrastructure at the foundation of a form of capitalism dependent on data brokering. We should be teaching our students about this and not teaching them about “responsible” use.

Happy to share that I’ve joined the Editorial Board of the Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy. Looking forward to contributing to @jicsp.bsky.social for critical, interdisciplinary & global scholarship on social policy. More about JICSP via  www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy | Cambridge Core

Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy - Stefan Kühner, Ijin Hong, Markus Ketola, Antonios Roumpakis

cambridge.org

🗓️ Termin für #IchBinHanna & alle Interessierten: Am 14. Juli um 11 Uhr stellt der @wissenschaftsrat.de sein Positionspapier "Personalstrukturen im deutschen Wissenschaftssystem" vor. Wir sind gespannt! @drkeichhorn.bsky.social @kubon.bsky.social Mehr Infos hier. ⬇️

Aktuelles - Einladung | Digitale Pressekonferenzen am 14. Juli

Im Anschluss an seine Sommersitzungen lädt der Wissenschaftsrat (WR) zu zwei Pressekonferenzen ein.

wissenschaftsrat.de