Lars Meyer

@languagecycles.bsky.social

Investigating and teaching neurobiology of language @ JGU Mainz, MPI Leipzig, & UK Münster; PI, ERC CoG BALANG & DFG 529614204 & 546844207 & G-BA 01VSF24036; Editor, "The Rhythms of Speech and Language" (CUP); Associate Editor, The Journal of Neuroscience

This is not a drill ⚠️ The abstract submission deadline is around the corner and you should all be planning your trip to Geneva.🇨🇭Get in touch if you have questions or comments.

SNL Annual Meeting@snlmtg.bsky.social · 3mo ago

Don't miss the latest episode of @smwilson.bsky.social's Language Neuroscience Podcast with @rmc-law.bsky.social and @vborghesani.bsky.social teasing the program of #SNL2026! 🍏 open.spotify.com/episode/0zAE... 🍎 podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s...

New preprint! 🧠 We show that neural synchronization to abstract linguistic structures is independent from acoustic processing, even with stimuli mirroring natural speech! w/ the dream team @diliberg.bsky.social @nicolaml.bsky.social @languagecycles.bsky.social 🔗 doi.org/10.64898/202...

Bridging the neural synchronization to linguistic structures and natural speech comprehension

Speech comprehension involves the inference of abstract information from continuous acoustic signals. Prior work suggests that electrophysiological activity is synchronized with abstract linguistic structures (phrases and sentences) during the processing of isochronous syllable sequences. It is yet unclear whether this prior evidence generalizes to natural speech comprehension, which requires the flexible processing of continuous speech, where syllables and other types of linguistic units are anisochronous. Our magnetoencephalography experiment investigated neural synchronization to acoustic (syllables) and abstract units (phrases and sentences) using continuous speech ranging from artificial isochronous to more natural anisochronous. We find that neural synchronization to phrases and sentences, but not syllables, is resilient to naturalistic anisochrony. This suggests that linguistic structure processing reflects endogenous inferences that are fundamentally distinct from the exogenous processing of syllables driven by speech acoustics. Lateralization and linear regression results extend this functional dissociation as hemispheric asymmetry: stimulus-independent leftward lateralization for linguistic structure processing but stimulus-driven rightward lateralization (or bilaterality) for both syllable and acoustic processing. Our findings provide a more realistic characterization of the flexible neural mechanisms supporting the efficient comprehension of natural speech. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

doi.org

We wrote a thing -- showing you don't need LLMs to model language production dynamics like the tendency for speakers to reduce predictable words. All you have to do is better model how speech rate varies depending on where a word is and how long the utterance is. arxiv.org/abs/2512.23659

Less is more: Probabilistic reduction is best explained by small-scale predictability measures

The primary research questions of this paper center on defining the amount of context that is necessary and/or appropriate when investigating the relationship between language model probabilities and ...

arxiv.org

Interested in a PhD intersecting clinical & fundamental language neuroscience? Help us uncover the neurological underpinnings of speech and language disorders! Work with me at UK Münster on a DFG-funded project, together w. Chris Kell & Katrin Neumann. Apply at jobs-sf.ukmuenster.de/job/UKM-PhD-...

PhD Student (gn*) Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology

PhD Student (gn*) Department of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology

jobs-sf.ukmuenster.de

another great paper from @mh-christiansen.bsky.social, showing that non-constituents* can be primed It's more evidence that traditional linguists were mistaken to believe memory was in short supply: Human memory is compressed, clustered, implicit and vast

Matt Bury, MA Online & Distance Ed & AppLing 🇪🇸@matbury.bsky.social · 6mo ago

@adelegoldberg.bsky.social Have you seen this? Nielsen, Y. A., & Christiansen, M. H. (2026). Evidence for the representation of non-hierarchical structures in language. Nature Human Behaviour, 1–10. doi.org/10.1038/s415...

This paper had a pretty shocking headline result (40% of voxels!), so I dug into it, and I think it is wrong. Essentially: they compare two noisy measures and find that about 40% of voxels have different sign between the two. I think this is just noise!

Eiko Fried@eikofried.bsky.social · 7mo ago

Would love to hear expert views on this paper. It appears to show that the operationalization of brain activity the field has relied on for 3 decades—the BOLD response—is not actually a sensible measure of brain activity. www.nature.com/articles/s41...