Sandy Ernest Allen

@sandyernestallen.bsky.social

(he/him) journalist/author. trans guy who lives in the woods. Words many places — including Esquire, Eater, Cosmo, The Cut, This American Life 📖: akomp.info (Scribner) https://www.sandyernestallen.com subscribe: https://whats-helping-today.beehiiv.com/

FWIW to me, it’s no great mystery. It’s purely sexism and the sense that “little girls” are owned by their families, the state, by society. “Girls” like “women” do not possess themselves and therefore to transition, as a “woman" into a man is a great usurping of power that is otherwise denied us …

Evan Urquhart@evanurquhart.bsky.social · 16h ago

Why is this? I can only throw up my hands and declare I do not know. A combination of factors, I assume. Whatever the reason, trans boys are growing up seeing themselves constantly described as confused mentally ill girls their whole lives, and that no one has come directly to their defense.

We have never put those words on this. We have never acknowledged who the primary targets are, or the way they are relentlessly misgendered. There is no discernable movement attempting to get people to stop misgendering trans boys.

Some of the escalations we're seeing, including the attack on Ilhan Omar's home (I will not pretend this act was "investigatory"), are desperate acts. But we must remember that desperate people can be very dangerous. A domestic abuse victim, for example, is in the most danger when trying to leave.

when something scary happens to ilhan i think about this photo. you’d never know from how brave she is that she isn’t seven feet tall. we’ve all got to have her back, because she isn’t just some character on capitol hill, she’s a real human, with real children, who deserves to be safe in her home.

me and ilhan and i am big and she is tiny

I will be forever grateful for the perspective, somehow, that Judy Shepard gave me (and countless others) in a way that so many of us didn't even know we needed. And I will always remember and cherish Matthew — and the legacy he left — despite never having had the privilege of meeting him.

I spoke a bit about Matthew Shepard over the weekend in person to some folks, but I didn't want to let the anniversary of his death — October 12, 1998 — pass by without giving a moment to him and his memory here.

"comedy isn't a safe space!" but that's what Shane Gillis is after, you know. the racism, the misogyny--it's not a question--a challenge--so much as a streak of piss against the treeline. for a long time, comedy has been a preserve of white male mediocrity.

you know Shane Gillis. he works with your brother; he's coaching your son. he misses real country music, before everything got all woke and political. he's so blue collar that he attended private schools exclusively. his family goes to Cabo every year.

Jokes aside, this kind of casual misogyny—no longer even shielded with the pretext of “transgressive” humor, but smugly asserted as fact and even science—has become really ubiquitous. Sucks IMO.

If you were ever targeted by the Gamergate horde from 2024 onward, I'd love to talk to you briefly for a short section in my book! Reply, DM me, or email me at alyssamerc@gmail.com. Signal boost!!

Bild

“In lieu of flowers or gifts, I am encouraging you today, from my heart, to donate funds or your time to your local LGBTQIA+ community,” Bakker continued. “It is time for Christians to stand up and show the true love of Christ. It is time to stop judging. To stop hating.”

Gabe Ortíz@tusk81.bsky.social · 14h ago

“It breaks my heart to know that the church has been responsible for millions of people suffering, being rejected by their families, living with depression, being kicked out of their family homes, feeling like outcasts, dealing with suicidal ideation, or dying by suicide.”

Part of the work of this moment is to insist on and expect compliance — and ensure that any noncompliance or efforts to lie to or otherwise mislead courts remain unacceptable and to be investigated thoroughly whenever they happen. They must remain seen — and responded to — as an aberration.

And, specifically, when you insist on replying to me with it — and I do not mean good-faith questions or analysis, but rather knee-jerk "they'll ignore it"/"there are no consequences" pablum — you tell me that you (1) don't actually know what's happening and (2) aren't attempting to understand.

I said this in a thread last night and in a thousand threads before it, but you really are doing the work of those who would destroy democracy and the rule of law when you are a doomer. You can be aware of — and vigorously oppose — the lawlessness of this administration without insisting on doom.