Léo Fitouchi

@lfitouchi.bsky.social

Cognitive scientist. Studying moral cognition & culture Postdoc at MIT & Harvard Website: leofitouchi.github.io

Looking forward to speaking at SPSP Religion & Spirituality Preconference, alongside Conrad Hackett, Patty Van Cappellen, and Kristen Laurin, on Feb 11 in Philadelphia! Submissions are open until October 8: spsp.wufoo.com/forms/2027-p...

Conrad Hackett@conradhackett.bsky.social · 4w ago

I look forward to giving the keynote address at the 2027 SPSP Religion & Spirituality Preconference on February 11 in Philadelphia. Submissions open. Propose a research talk, data blitz, or poster by October 8. spsp.wufoo.com/forms/2027-p... Graduate-student registration fees will be waived.

The 2027 Religion & Spirituality Preconference will be a full-day in-person session on February 11 in Philadelphia, PA (8am - 5pm).


We are now accepting submissions for research talks, data blitzes, and posters through October 8. Plenty of time has been allotted for submitted presentations, so we encourage you to apply.


We have an exciting lineup of invited speakers, including a keynote presentation from Conrad Hackett (Pew Research Center), and podium talks from Patty Van Cappellen (Duke University), Kristin Laurin (UBC), and Léo Fitouchi (MIT & Harvard). There will also be a panel on translational research, a mentorship lunch, and a preconference happy hour. 


Graduate-student registration fees will be waived through the support of The John Templeton Foundation.


Details and submission: https://spsp.wufoo.com/forms/2027-preconference-submission-portal/ 


Please feel free to forward this announcement to graduate students, postdocs, faculty, or research groups working on the psychology of religion and spirituality.


Any questions about submission details may be directed to Nava Caluori (ncaluori@umass.edu)

Why do societies rely on rigid moral rules? Don't lie. Keep your promises. Don't steal. We all recognize there are good reasons to make exceptions. So why are moral rules so often categorical? Our new paper proposes an answer. 🧵

Screenshot of article title page, "Why human societies adopt rigid moral rules"

"contractualism stands on three theoretical pillars that have stood the test of time and enjoyed widespread influence across the humanities, the natural sciences, and the social sciences: social-contract theory, evolutionary theory, and game theory"

Contractualist Moral Cognition: From the Normative to the Descriptive at Three Levels of Analysis

Visual summary of the paper. Taking inspiration from the contractualist tradition in moral philosophy is helpful to better understand morality at three interrelated levels of analysis: Its evolutiona...

wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com

📣 New BBS preprint out now! 📣 "Models casting egalitarian societies as crucibles of equality perpetuate the factually uninformed notion that foragers are somehow more noble. Critiques portray egalitarianism as romantic fantasy. Neither characterization is wholly justified." doi.org/10.1017/S014...

Egalitarianism is not Equality: Moving from outcome to process in the study of human political organisation | Behavioral and Brain Sciences | Cambridge Core

Egalitarianism is not Equality: Moving from outcome to process in the study of human political organisation

doi.org

>The Multi-Capital Leadership theory explains why #leadership emerges and why it varies among human societies and throughout individual life histories. w/@chrisvonrueden.bsky.social & @edhagen.net #LeadSciSky #HBES 🧪 link.springer.com/article/10.1...

The Multi-Capital Leadership Theory - Human Nature

Human leadership and followership take many forms, shaped by the social, economic, political, and cultural contexts of our groups and societies. Underlying this complexity, we argue, are key elements of human social psychology regarding social comparison and the resolution of coordination and collective action problems. The Multi-Capital Leadership (MCL) theory posits that leader emergence and effectiveness depend on perceptions of individuals’ abilities to provide benefits or impose costs in solving challenges of group living, through the deployment of different forms of capital: material, social, somatic (e.g., physical formidability, height, immune functionality), and neural (e.g., knowledge, intelligence, personality, supernatural abilities). We integrate this framework with a review of leadership across human societies, including in non-state and non-industrial contexts, and with novel comparative analyses of ethnographic data. This synthesis highlights how context-specific demands for coordination and collective action, and the accuracy of social comparison, shape the structure and dynamics of leadership and followership across cultures.

link.springer.com

New commentary out w/ @manvir.bsky.social in Religion, Brain, and Behavior! We argue that social learning fails to explain three patterns in religious belief and practice: SBNR beliefs, strategic endorsement of beliefs, and religious experience. Check it out: www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

Strategy and experience required: Social learning cannot explain the varieties of supernatural belief

Published in Religion, Brain & Behavior (Ahead of Print, 2025)

tandfonline.com