Joel Johnson

@joeljohnson13.bsky.social

Law Prof at Pepperdine -- Criminal Law and Procedure, Statutory Interpretation, Constitutional Law Research @ http://tinyurl.com/SSRNjsj

New draft paper on SSRN: "Fact Avoidance," forthcoming in the Harvard Law Review Supreme Court Issue. This Essay identifies a recurring feature where the Court decides presidential power cases entirely on legal grounds without engaging at all with the facts /1 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....

Fact Avoidance

<p><i><span>The legality of the President’s exercise of statutory power depends on questions of both law and fact. Yet courts often focus exclusively on the for

papers.ssrn.com

Was great to be back on Doug Berman’s Drugs on the Docket podcast with my friend & colleague @joeljohnson13.bsky.social to break down the Hemani decision & the Supreme Court’s many Second Amendment failings. 👇 Full episode: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/s... youtu.be/TfxIjlZFdNQ?...

U.S. v. Hemani Decision | S4 E3 Teaser | Drugs on the Docket #shorts #podcast #supremecourt

YouTube video by The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law

youtu.be

In Chatrie, I found the discussion about whether reaching the "search" question was appropriate to be interesting. At the other place, @epps.bsky.social noted that he thought it was appropriate to allow law to evolve. I tend to agree. But it points to a larger issue in 4A litigation. 🧵1/

Bild

I’m excited to share that my latest article, “The Multidimensions of AI Chatbots as Evidence,” is now forthcoming in the U.C. Davis Law Review. The abstract is below, and I plan to have it up on SSRN soon.

Bild

SCOOP: Federal judiciary approves new Supreme Court defender office to help represent indigent defendants at #SCOTUS. Its full-time director will serve as a counterweight to the U.S. solicitor general in federal criminal cases. The first will be former Kagan clerk and SG atty Ashley Robertson.

BIG IN THE 4A WORLD: The Supreme Court has granted cert in Chatrie, the geofence warrant case, to decide the following Q: "Whether the execution of the geofence warrant violated the Fourth Amendment." (I assume this includes both whether a "search" happened and whether the warrant was lawful.)

How often can you read amicus briefs from colleagues at the same law school arguing for opposite sides in the same case?? Check out Joel’s super interesting brief urging the Court not to even reach the 2nd Am q. My amicus brief (w/ other 2A scholars) is here: www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24...

supremecourt.gov

Joel Johnson@joeljohnson13.bsky.social · 7mo ago

I’ve filed an amicus brief in Hemani, the pending case involving a #SecondAmendment challenge to 18 USC 922(g)(3). The case is perceived as a sequel to Bruen and Rahimi. My brief argues that the Court can avoid the constitutional thicket by narrowly construing the statute. 🧵

I’ve filed an amicus brief in Hemani, the pending case involving a #SecondAmendment challenge to 18 USC 922(g)(3). The case is perceived as a sequel to Bruen and Rahimi. My brief argues that the Court can avoid the constitutional thicket by narrowly construing the statute. 🧵

Bild

Excited to announce that my book, REVOLUTION IN REDLINE, is finally out! I compile key docs leading to the Founding, then present the Founding Docs in "redline," visually tracking the drafters' edits to show how the text evolved. (The Founders didn't start from scratch, and they disagreed often.)1/6

BildBildBild

Later this week at #AALS, I’ll be presenting my new paper, The New Criminal Docket and the Clemency Court. The paper examines how the contemporary Supreme Court curates and resolves its criminal merits docket—and how that practice has quietly changed. 🧵

Bild