Anna Bower
@annabower.bsky.social
Just asking questions. Senior Editor, Lawfaremedia.org. Send story ideas and tips to anna.bower@lawfaremedia.org
WITAODlings, assemble! there are literally tens of us and we each get ten votes together, we form the most powerful voting bloc no one has ever heard of!
Avengers Endgame: Assemble!
Alt: Avengers Endgame: Assemble! steve rogers saying avengers assemble at the end of end game
static.klipy.com
Who are the 38 most influential Bluesky posters of 2026? You get 10 votes, anyone with a Bluesky account can be voted for. The 38 with the most votes make the list. 🗳️ Voting ends the 21st night of September. 🌎 🌬️🔥 Cast your ballot: bsky38.com
Stay denied. Mistrial officially declared. That means there is no verdict and Clancy can be re-tried.
Omg. Defense counsel asks for emergency stay so he can seek appeal from the Supreme Judicial Court. Trial judge gives him one hour to get a stay of the declaration of mistrial.
Appellate emergencies are rare, but when they happen they are really intense.
Omg. Defense counsel asks for emergency stay so he can seek appeal from the Supreme Judicial Court. Trial judge gives him one hour to get a stay of the declaration of mistrial.
They don’t want a mistrial because the jury indicated that it was an 11-1 split in favor of finding Clancy not guilty. They want the one holdout juror to be replaced with an alternate. Foreperson indicated the holdout had doubts but refused to apply the law.
Why don’t they want a mistrial? They believe the hold out was the lone guilty vote?
Omg. Defense counsel asks for emergency stay so he can seek appeal from the Supreme Judicial Court. Trial judge gives him one hour to get a stay of the declaration of mistrial.
BREAKING: Mistrial declared in Lindsay Clancy case.
Wow. Jury just sent a note saying that “with a heavy heart” it cannot come to a unanimous decision and will not be able to.
In other words: 11 jurors agree that there is reasonable doubt and want to find Clancy not guilty (or, more likely, not guilty by reason of insanity). But one lone juror is holding out, despite having made statements acknowledging doubt.
In other words: 11 jurors agree that there is reasonable doubt and want to find Clancy not guilty (or, more likely, not guilty by reason of insanity). But one lone juror is holding out, despite having made statements acknowledging doubt.
Wild stuff happening in the Clancy case. The jury foreperson sent a note to the judge yesterday. According to defense counsel, the note was sent on behalf of 11 jurors. It stated that a holdout juror “has made statements acknowledging doubt, but refuses to apply it to the verdict as the law states.”
Wild stuff happening in the Clancy case. The jury foreperson sent a note to the judge yesterday. According to defense counsel, the note was sent on behalf of 11 jurors. It stated that a holdout juror “has made statements acknowledging doubt, but refuses to apply it to the verdict as the law states.”
CNN reports that Christian Castro—ICE officer who shot Venezuelan man in leg in Minnesota—has been federally charged with lying about events that led up to the shooting. Castro is also charged at the state level and was subject of extradition fight between TX and MN. www.cnn.com/2026/09/03/p...
ICE agent federally charged with lying over shooting of a Venezuelan immigrant | CNN Politics
An Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent has been federally charged with lying about the events leading up to his shooting of a Venezuelan immigrant in the leg earlier this year, according to mult...
cnn.com
Follow @johnhawkinson.bsky.social for updates in the USPS mail ballots case this morning. (My colleague @mollyroberts.bsky.social is there too and we’ll discuss on Lawfare Live tomorrow at 4:00 p.m.!)
Good morning from the Moakley Courthouse, outside Courtroom 9, where we'll have the 9am preliminary injunction hearing in League of Women Voters v. Trump and California v. USPS. It's pretty rainy in Boston today and I think I biked through the worst of it.
DOJ: a PI would moot out the TRO and allow an additional path for relief. IT: A TRO…is temporary. I don't think you could go to the SCOTUS on the TRO unless you do so before I issue a decision. I guess you can decide whether they'll rule on that before I issue a decision.
DOJ request the court rule at the hearing today or immediately thereafter, otherwise he's authorized to represent he'll seek emergency Supreme Court relief. IT: What of what I do gets you immediate supreme court relief? DOJ: … we would seek a SCOTUS stay on the TRO. A PI would moot out the TRO.
The DOJ atty (Michael…?) does not think jurisdiction is stripped by the pending appeal, nor the other defendants. He also has a housekeeping matter.
aruging counsel introduce. There were ten+, I did not generally cathc their names. Talwani: "There's been al ot of activity int he case.Dont' tjhink can be accused of slow-walking. I want to start with jurisdiction" She asks about the interlocutory appeal.
ALL RISE, Judge Talwani on the bench at 8:56am, a hair early!
We have an overflow courtroom, but I don't think we'll really need it. There are still plenty of seats here, although it's certainly not empty. Many more plaintiffs than reporters though.
Good morning from the Moakley Courthouse, outside Courtroom 9, where we'll have the 9am preliminary injunction hearing in League of Women Voters v. Trump and California v. USPS. It's pretty rainy in Boston today and I think I biked through the worst of it.
Jury sent home for the day. They’ll be back tomorrow at 9 am.
The jury is still deliberating but they have twice told the judge that they are unable to come to a unanimous decision. The judge just gave them the final jury charge and instructed them to continue deliberating. If they tell him they are deadlocked again, he can declare a mistrial.
The jury is still deliberating but they have twice told the judge that they are unable to come to a unanimous decision. The judge just gave them the final jury charge and instructed them to continue deliberating. If they tell him they are deadlocked again, he can declare a mistrial.
Looks like the Clancy case is headed for a mistrial. A horrible outcome for everyone involved. Wow.
Looks like the Clancy case is headed for a mistrial. A horrible outcome for everyone involved. Wow.
Whither (or wither?) aesthetic standing? My piece for @lawfaremedia.org on what the Supreme Court’s very unconvincing ballroom cop-out actually means: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...
The Supreme Court’s Ballroom Non-Decision
The Court avoided the merits of Trump’s ballroom fight by leaning on aesthetic standing—and left the doctrine murkier than before.
lawfaremedia.org
NEW: We @lawfaremedia.org sued Marco Rubio over the State Department’s failure to publish certain international agreements, as required by the Case Act. Yesterday, Judge Boasberg denied the government’s motion to dismiss our suit. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...
I think that’s what he’s doing in all my moments, sadly. I have never been wrong thinking the worst of Trump.
I am, in my gloomier moments, convinced he’s trying to flush out anyone with qualms about obeying grossly illegal and immoral orders before 2029.
NEWS: Working with coalition partners, we’re suing to stop the Trump administration from abusing Americans’ personal data to build a massive federal voting database and tip the scales of our elections. protectdemocracy.org/work/trump-a...
Challenging the Trump administration’s threats to voting rights, privacy, and state authority over elections - Protect Democracy
We are suing the Trump administration over its unlawful efforts to compile American voters’ sensitive personal information into a massive centralized database.
protectdemocracy.org
fun fact: sheepshead bay is named after sheepshead fish this is what their teeth look like!!
we took the “american princess” cruise from sheepshead bay we spotted some dolphins and a very hungry humpback whale today 10/10 recommend and here’s another video i got of the whale lunge feeding on some fish americanprincesscruises.com
two pieces from me this morning: 1. the right is not giving up on its quest to overturn birthright citizenship. will trump v barbara be the next roe?
How the Right Could Actually End Birthright Citizenship
The conservative legal movement doesn’t consider the Supreme Court’s recent ruling to be the final word on the Fourteenth Amendment. And it already has a playbook for overturning it.
theatlantic.com
people are saying they can’t tell the difference between these videos and honestly they aren’t wrong
beast of the day