Peter Harrell

@petereharrell.bsky.social

Many posts will be about international economics and/or politics. Plus other topics that are on my mind.

Trump can rely on plenty of laws to implement his tariff ambitions. (He could even ask Congress for new powers if he can sell his vision). But IEEPA--the 1977 law frequently used for sanctions--should not be one of those laws. My take in @lawfare.bsky.social: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...

The Case Against IEEPA Tariffs

Forcing Trump to use trade statutes—or to go to Congress to seek new authorities—would be more consistent with IEEPA’s history and practice.

lawfaremedia.org

Top questions for Lutnick confirmation today: 1. Details on tariff plans, including legal authorities? 2. Will he continue CHIPS? 3. Export control lessons from DeepSeek? 4. What Chinese ICTS devices/software should the Department's ICTS office focus on as potential security risks?

Will be interesting to see next week if Trump’s Trade EO, which starts a deliberative process on tariffs that will play out over months and involve lots of analysis, or if Trump’s repeated remarks of “25% tariffs starting Feb. 1!!!” prevail. Definitely the “let’s see what happens” trade Presidency.

Tomorrow at 10:30 am, the CSIS Economic Security and Technology Department welcomes Reta Jo Lewis, Chair of the Export-Import Bank of the United States, to discuss how the newly introduced Supply Chain Resiliency Initiative can bolster U.S. economic security. Register: www.csis.org/events/secur...

Securing America’s Economic Future: A Conversation with EXIM Chair Reta Jo Lewis | CSIS Events

Join CSIS EST for a conversation with EXIM Chair Reta Jo Lewis on the new Supply Chain Resiliency Initiative (SCRI), fostering U.S. economic security through resilient supply chains, plus insights on ...

csis.org

Reps. Moolenaar and Krishnamoorthi joint statement and letter out in support of the planned AI chips partner deployment rule is an interesting counterpoint to some of the (at times colorful) opposition out from industry over the past several weeks.

Today's Department of Commerce action starting the process to ban Chinese-made drones illustrates a point I've been making for the last year: bans on devices and software due to perceived security risks will be as important an element of U.S.-China decoupling as are tariffs and export controls.

IEEPA, a statute originally passed in 1977 to deal with time limited emergencies, is now used for everything from sanctions to cloud services KYC to Chinese investment restrictions. I agree with many of the specific uses, but it is past time for Congress to examine the statute and look at reforms.

Interesting that Commerce is considering banning Chinese WiFi routers, citing security risks and using the same “ICTS” authority used for Chinese connected cars. My take: “connected device restrictions” will become a 3rd pillar of US-China economic statecraft, alongside tariffs & export controls.

Pleased to co-author with CJ Mahoney a new Carnegie Endowment piece on how the Trump Administration can use the 2026 USMCA renegotiation to strengthen U.S. industry, build supply chain resilience, and promote secure supplies for clean energy materials: carnegieendowment.org/research/202...

Toward a Cleaner, Smarter USMCA

Renewal negotiations offer the best—maybe the only—path to strengthening North America's clean energy supply chain.

carnegieendowment.org

My take on Lighthizer's job search is much less fun than the news stories. He wanted Treasury or Commerce. Those are always hard given (a) 2 openings, and (b) many qualified candidates. When Trump went elsewhere, Lighthizer decided happy to advise from the outside. Also, Trump still wants tariffs.

Post nicht verfügbar.