Steve Kennedy

@skennedy2504.myatproto.social

Parent of four, Organizing & Network Director at People's Parity Project, UU lay preacher, former structural biologist and airborne infantry, fake lawyer. He/him

One thing I remember and hardly anyone seems to is that there's a sort of sexual revolution interregnum when all sex was good (seen from the adult male perspective, which it mostly was) including sex with children, which was publicly defended. Feminism, mostly, is what changed that.

As a survivor of sexual assault by a priest, writing about revival windows was especially personal for me. The idea that survivors abused by public employees could be barred from the same accountability that we got is such an insult. It's hard to believe ballsandstrikes.org/law-politics...

Judges Shouldn’t Give States a Pass On Sexual Abuse

Lawmakers create “revival windows” to hold abusers accountable. But by interpreting these laws narrowly, courts can lock survivors out of court.

ballsandstrikes.org

our operations structure is actually the perfect counterpoint to the suit- Storrs administration maintains massive staffing inequality at UConn Hartford, the proportions of full time faculty to part time are far lower than Storrs. in effect a learning community that gets less for the same tuition

They are not as bloody as in the past, but the right-wing attacks on affinity spaces continue a long history of the forces of white supremacy destroying spaces where marginalized people can build solidarity and collective power newrepublic.com/article/2132...

The Right-Wing War on Solidarity Comes to Campus

A recent civil rights complaint against the University of Connecticut is the latest in a long line of attempts to dismantle the ability of ordinary people to manifest collective political power.

newrepublic.com

"meeting people where they are" means you have to accept that they sincerely believe what they believe. It does NOT mean that you have to pretend to agree with their beliefs. In fact, you must be honest when you don't. Grown ups have to deal with people who don't agree with them all of the time.

The entire credibility of judicial review rests on the fact that there's a reasoning behind orders that can be applied going forward. Otherwise it's just arbitrary rule by ayatollahs, which happens to be what the Supreme Court is right now.

Alex Aronson@alexaronson.bsky.social · 2mo ago

Amy Coney Barrett just told Congress that it would be inappropriate to explain the reasoning behind the Court’s unreasoned shadow docket orders. As if unreasoned judicial orders are a thing. They are not. The reasoning is the whole point.