Ze Freeman

@zefreeman.bsky.social

(he/they) psychology metascience postdoc @unibe.ch looking at measurement, mental health, credibility of research zefreeman.com

"post-publication review makes it possible to discuss a piece of work once it has been made public, to ask questions, propose alternative interpretations, point out errors, and collectively think about what remains to be done"

ReproducibiliTea@reproducibilitea.org · 7d ago

Adrien Fillon writes: “And I believe that, ultimately, post-publication review is about our capacity to hold a colloquium, that is, etymologically, to keep a conversation going.”

I’m hiring a PhD student to work with me on metascience in psychology at @zpid.bsky.social! The position is very open - could cover a wide range of topics/themes 🤸🏻‍♀️✨ If you have questions, please reach out! Applications are open until October 1st. leibniz-psychology.onlyfy.jobs/en/job/fyjwt...

PhD in Psychological Meta-Science (m/f/d)

Become part of the open science movement The Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID) in Trier (Germany) is an internationally recognized research-based psychology service center located in...

leibniz-psychology.onlyfy.jobs

The new UK bathroom ban is many things, but it does not apply to workplaces and trans people are not criminalised for using any toilet in the UK. Trans people do not need to provide 'proof' to use services, and services can choose to be inclusive. More here: transactual.org.uk/know-your-ri...

Know Your Rights – TransActual

transactual.org.uk

Channel 4 News@channel4news.bsky.social · 3mo ago

EHRC chair challenged on how to enforce single-sex toilet rules www.channel4.com/news/ehrc-ch...

Research on cognitive offloading × AI is booming and getting lots of public attention. Unfortunately, some (or even many) of it raises serious credibility concerns. Like this paper, which others and I recently commented on via @pubpeer.com: pubpeer.com/publications...

PubPeer - AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the...

There are comments on PubPeer for publication: AI Tools in Society: Impacts on Cognitive Offloading and the Future of Critical Thinking (2025)

pubpeer.com

Does anyone know of a tidy dataset with a large number of common multi-item self-report psychology scales? Ideally clinical. The data does not have to be within-subject, just a variety of common scales with decent N. I have: - Bainbridge et al - AIID dataset - Ideologies 2.0 dataset

"1. Those who resist epistemological norms are often accused of being unscientific or unrigorous. 2. Resisting epistemological norms can be done in an unrigorous way. 3. Resistance does not exist outside of social influence. In resisting some norms, we can recreate other norms."

Pippa Sterk@pippasterk.bsky.social · 6mo ago

Proud to share my article for the inaugural issue of re:wave! In it, I discuss how tempting it is to present 'marginalised' knowledge as a solution to the flaws of the academic status quo, but how we nevertheless should resist this temptation towards simplicity 📚 rewave.press/eating-epist...

"honesty, insofar as I have a public voice, about the ways in which the profession I practice is being asked to absorb and individually manage forms of suffering that are, in part, collective in origin and that deserve collective responses"

Awais Aftab@awaisaftab.bsky.social · 8mo ago

A post in which I highlight the need for a clinical language that does justice to trait-demand mismatches and sees them as firmly and unapologetically deserving of clinical care. www.psychiatrymargins.com/p/what-do-we...

"Pooling data across many trials could also help answer questions about studies’ operational characteristics: How does remote monitoring compare with on-site testing? Which trial sites reliably deliver high-quality data? Which eligibility criteria slow down recruitment?"

Saloni@scientificdiscovery.dev · 9mo ago

New short blogpost! There are probably many benefits of sharing clinical trial data, including: Verifying results, better meta-analysis, understanding inconsistent results, further exploration, better clinical decision-making, learning how to run trials better, and reducing redundancy.

behold, we found great variation in how people think! Many activities that we thought would be “gaming” weren't & vice versa, eg half of the participants interpreted ‘gambling’ to be ‘gaming’. Ergo: surveying ‘gaming’ without defining it creates data mess

Bild