Matthew Gill

@drmatthewgill.bsky.social

EVENT | Regulation in a changing world: How to meet the needs of the future? 📅Wednesday 15 July 2026, 13:45-17:25 A half-day conference bringing together experts from across government, industry and civil society to discuss the future of regulation in the UK. The conference will include...

Bild

This is well worth a look if you're interested in the foundations of public body independence, particularly for scientific bodies providing specialist evidence and expertise. The resource builds on extensive UCL research from last year, also referenced in the thread.

Prof Christina Pagel@chrischirp.bsky.social · last mo.

📢NEW RESOURCE: A new web resource and accompanying report to explore the vulnerabilities to political interference of 33 key UK scientific public bodies & 11 scientific advisory committees! unchecked.uk/public_body_... 1/7

summary of some key results on the vulnerabilties of scientific bodies

My latest short piece for @instituteforgovernment.org.uk is part of our series marking 10 years since the Brexit vote. I focus on regulation, but colleagues have written on the economy, civil service, foreign policy, law, policymaking, devolution, parliament and politics itself. Well worth a browse!

Institute for Government@instituteforgovernment.org.uk · last mo.

Regulation has been front and centre of implementing Brexit, but not in the way its proponents might have hoped. @drmatthewgill.bsky.social sets out four questions the UK government must answer in the years ahead www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/brex...

A quote from a comment piece by Dr Matthew Gill from the Institute for Government.

"Having increased its options by leaving the EU, the UK must develop the maturity to understand when the exercise of regulatory sovereignty brings benefits and when to defer to others.12  As Brexit approaches its teens, politicians need to learn how to manage that balance – and bring the country with them."

The photo is of cargo shipping containers.

There's often pressure to set up a public inquiry, but they're expensive and rarely a panacea. Lots of insight in this report on how we can use them better!

Rebecca McKee@rebeccamckee.bsky.social · 8mo ago

📝Our new @instituteforgovernment.org.uk report with @jackpannell.bsky.social & @emmanorris.bsky.social out today sets out out the underlying problems with the way public inquiries are established We argue ministers need better support to make informed decisions about how an inquiry should be set up

A case study well worth noting, with a recurrent theme that policy targeting is crude - due to: political incentives; easy levers not aligning with need; markets requiring careful stewardship; central decision-making being in tension with local sensitivity. Reads across to many other policy fields!

Sophie Metcalfe@sophiemetcalfe.bsky.social · 8mo ago

NEW report from @nehaldavison.bsky.social and I. Why have successive governments failed to tackle persistent inequalities in early years outcomes? We set out 5 systemic policy making failures that lead to some children being 'left behind'. 🧵⬇️ www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...

NEW REPORT: abolishing NHS England could help simplify accountability, improve prioritisation and create savings. But the change could also lead to increases in policy incoherence and blame culture, as well as the loss of skills, capacity and focus on areas outside the day-to-day NHS.

Abolished to perfection? Building a better centre for the NHS | Institute for Government

The abolition of NHS England creates both risks and opportunities.

instituteforgovernment.org.uk

Hot on the heels of yesterday's Covid inquiry report on decision making, @shaina-sangha.bsky.social and I have a new report out today looking at how combined epidemiological-economic modelling could help government better prepare for future pandemics www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...

Combined epidemiological and economic modelling | Institute for Government

The pandemic showed the need for government to improve its use of modelling.

instituteforgovernment.org.uk

Important new research from UCL (@chrischirp.bsky.social @martinmckee.bsky.social). It explores both how greater politicisation of scientific agencies might come about and why it matters. Comparative international research forcefully illustrates the stakes involved. This is well worth your time.

Prof Christina Pagel@chrischirp.bsky.social · 10mo ago

🧵🚨 The UK’s independent scientific bodies are highly vulnerable to politicisation - over the past 5 months I've been working with @martinmckee.bsky.social to map out their vulnerabilities and it's not good news. Today our report is published! www.ucl.ac.uk/policy-lab/n... 1/11

1/ The government’s response to the open letter co-ordinated by @instituteforgovernment.org.uk (@drhannahwhite.bsky.social @alexgathomas.bsky.social) on civil servants speaking in public is not only disappointing, but also surprising...

Hannah White@drhannahwhite.bsky.social · last yr.

We at @instituteforgovernment.org.uk have coordinated a letter in @thetimes.com today in which numerous individuals and organisations call on the government to withdraw its mistaken rules which are having a serious chilling effect on civil servants speaking in public…

Good to see this new NAO report published this morning: www.nao.org.uk/reports/acco.... Burdens of accountability are proportionately higher for smaller government bodies, but it is also harder for them to get the support they need in government to meet them. Some good ideas here to rectify that.

Accountability in small government bodies - NAO report

Government can release resources and improve accountability by tailoring governance and audit requirements for small public bodies.

nao.org.uk

The government’s current focus on regulatory reform is welcome, but I argue for @instituteforgovernment.org.uk that it has an opportunity to think more systematically – and ambitiously – if it can organise itself in a way that makes that possible: www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/regu...

Regulatory reform: systemic thinking, not tinkering | Institute for Government

The government’s aspirations to streamline regulation cannot be achieved piecemeal.

instituteforgovernment.org.uk

New research - and guidance - from colleagues at @instituteforgovernment.org.uk on the important subject of ministers' roles during crises...

Paddy McAlary@paddy-mcalary.bsky.social · last yr.

📣New @instituteforgovernment.org.uk report & guide on ministerial leadership during crises Most government ministers will face a crisis of one type or another in office – and this can be make or break. So how can a minister successfully prepare for crises and what roles can they play? 🧵