Declan

@dskews.bsky.social

Science and maths, finance, politics, and I will like/share art until my fingers fall off. Sometimes obsess about weird bits of regulation. Would you like some solar panels? I know a guy. Opinions my own etc.

Steve's daily videos on what the Russian newspapers are worrying about are really good. I would like a Steve (funded by the Beeb World Service) for more countries. And yes, we should better fund the World Service!

Steve Rosenberg@bbcstever.bsky.social · 23h ago

In today’s #ReadingRussia: a look at the language Moscow uses to describe the war on Ukraine. Plus, more on the consequences of Ukrainian drone attacks. And a Hollywood blockbuster (unofficially) hits Russian cinema screens.

There need to be some very lengthy prison sentences for all involved. It does not take an experiment to work out that exposing large numbers of people to pro-suicide content results in suicides.

Alexandra Lahav@alahav.bsky.social · 2d ago

New @bloomberglaw.com article by Olivia Carville - TikTok experimented on users, putting 10% (about 15M people) in a "filter bubble" exposing them to repetitive content that the algorithm thought they wanted, but was toxic. If you want to know why these cases are going to be massive...

Sean Wiswesser, former CIA officer: Countries like Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan are helping Russians avoid sanctions and get away with the war in Ukraine. Meanwhile, they’re being very duplicitous, saying, "No, no, we want to be more closely integrated with EU and West." Nonsense. Then act like it.

Surely the same law/right which protects one charity's right to be anti-rights also protects another charity's right to (truthfully) describe them as such? And if there is a discrepancy in the law as it applies to those 2 positions, perhaps we ought to modify said law?

Barbara Rich@barbararich.bsky.social · 6d ago

I don’t think the Charity Commission would let Amnesty International UK get away with describing any other charity organised around beliefs which are protected in English law as “anti-rights”, nor should it do so.

It strikes me that many people have an odd view of how utility or cost-benefit calculations should be done when it comes to policy. In e.g. business, it can be done (mostly) using a linear-value, directly comparable unit of measurement. Money. In policy though it also depends how you assign value.