emily🤭

@em.ily.dev

pfp https://picrew.me/en/image_maker/1496263

i miss waymo, so much safer they don’t run lights , they don’t cut people off, don’t weave through traffic , dont drive the wrong way, don’t get tired, don’t get distracted, dont text and drive , dont talk on the phone and drive can’t wait until human driving is ~banned

yeah this seems pretty straightforwardly a deficit resulting from severely limited ability to model other minds and their needs in other contexts a more puzzling quirk i keep seeing is a tendency to try to document every conceivable cross reference like listing every caller in a function’s docs

Noah@ncallaway.bsky.social · 2d ago

One thing I notice when they write comments about their code, is they’re very much written in the frame of “helpful to the person currently doing the task” and often terrible for “person reading the code in two weeks”. A ton of “we put this here instead of in file X because Y”

One thing I notice when they write comments about their code, is they’re very much written in the frame of “helpful to the person currently doing the task” and often terrible for “person reading the code in two weeks”. A ton of “we put this here instead of in file X because Y”

a very good ren@lathrys.at · 3d ago

this is another data point for my hypothesis that current frontier models have dogshit theory of mind. it shows up here, in code comments, descriptive text, etc. just a complete lack of ability to accurately model individuals and their perspectives and what they may know and what that means for them

this is another data point for my hypothesis that current frontier models have dogshit theory of mind. it shows up here, in code comments, descriptive text, etc. just a complete lack of ability to accurately model individuals and their perspectives and what they may know and what that means for them

Eris@isolyth.dev · 3d ago

watching fable and sol both fail to write passable dialogue is deadass extending my timelines I do not understand why they are both seemingly totally unable to not have characters know things they should not or have distinct character voices at fucking all

saw an interview once with ira glass talking about the “gap between taste and ability” and there’s an interesting discussion to be had about how llms might or might not help fill that gap but it’s also becoming increasingly clear that a lot of people don’t have ability OR taste

Lady Emily ☄️@ladyemily.nebula.tv · 2d ago

Something I’ve had to come to terms with in the rise of AI generated fliers and menu photos is that a lot of people just straight up do not know what looks good. They’re given a theoretical infinite possibility machine and still go with the most uncanny ugly shit they get as their first result

"What do we do when we say silly things?" I giggle, because that seems like the kind of thing a bimbo would do. "That's right!" Later he tells me how he remembers giving me that trigger ages ago. I don't remember that being a suggestion AT ALL. ZERO memory of it. But I still responded to it!!!!!

This is an irresponsible headline and people sharing it out of context is pure fear-based engagement bait… “The Stanford researchers picked the most promising 302 AI designs and synthesised them in the lab. Of these, 16 proved effective at killing E. coli bacteria.” This isn’t a bad thing.

Artificial Intelligence used to design brand new viruses

Scientists made 16 successful viruses that had their genetic code designed by artificial intelligence.

bbc.com

Paul Fairie@paulisci.bsky.social · 3d ago

what are we doing

Headline: Artificial intelligence used to design brand new viruses

imo, it isnt really a surprise that all of these AI labs are having significant problems. anthropic isn't going to be using sol to review their code, and openai isn't going to be using fable to review theirs. and neither of their best models are capable of producing good software without the other.

AND boosts their profile. They say disgusting, outrageous things SO you'll quote-skeet for your dunk, parking them in the timelines of thousands who would otherwise never even see them. Great promo! Stop being the free street team for the worst people on earth.

Kanna Banana 🏳️‍⚧️🇧🇷@kanna-banana.bsky.social · 3d ago

stop arguing with transphobes, it never changes their damn minds all you achieve is putting transphobes on my god damn timeline epically owning the bigots only feeds your ego

ten years ago apple had the worst music streaming app and since then they’ve somehow managed to make it ten times worse

I'll keep saying this because its so beyond frustrating how dumb this mob is. like these people... don't think at all; they "discovered" hank uses ai (despite him saying this months ago), and now they are riding the anti science train to harass him into apologizing for using tools.

soft paw fan 64@slime.bsky.social · last wk.

hank green did nothing wrong and these people's irrational criticism against him is completely insane. this conservative moral crusade; they are going around and actively harassing anyone who isn't "pure"

this all rings true, though i would say it's the rest of society, not silicon valley, that's slacking here. ai labs are doing their part to bring us to superabundance! in exchange, the rest of society should be giving us ubi! that's a thing only society at large can do!

Jeremy Diamond ☕️@dmnd.me · 5d ago

Third: In the absence of clear direct benefits, people are just going to focus on the losses. Any use of AI to justify layoffs will blow back on the big tech companies, even if they're not the ones conducting layoffs. Execs think they can discipline their labor forces for free. They're wrong.

If you start getting the losses before the gains — you start getting the job loss, for instance, before the promised superabundance — politically, that’s not going to be an equilibrium you can protect.

That’s one of the things I’m worried about. I do think that we are pretty likely to see — we are seeing — a lot of the social instability before we get the cancer cures. Or even with the math stuff.

I think that one thing I notice more and more now is this deep cultural and values gap between Silicon Valley and the rest of America, the rest of the world.

I’m not saying that Silicon Valley is wrong in thinking that it’s cool to disprove the Jacobian conjecture. It is cool.

But when you ask a lot of people in the tech industry what their utopia looks like, they’ll say things like: We have a universal basic income so no one has to work anymore. We’re all immortal, and we’ve discovered all of math and physics.

the belief that change can make things better is the "progress" part of "progressive", while "conserving the past" and resisting change is where "conservative" comes from. a lot of so called leftists these days are actually conservative