endorama.bsky.social

@endorama.bsky.social

On 19 November 2025, the European Commission unveiled the new Digital Omnibus, claiming it would “simplify” tech rules. In reality, it reopens laws that protect us from Big Tech abuse, unsafe AI, scams, and online harm.

Bild
E

#BigTech is trying to break the rules - again. Google and Musk were held accountable, but lobbyists now want to weaken the laws that protect our safety, privacy, and money online ✍️ Tell EU leaders: protect people, not billionaires! action.wemove.eu/sign/2026-01...

Keep Big Tech Accountable!

Big Tech is trying to get away with breaking the rules - again.Google and Musk have already been held accountable, but now lobbyists are pushing to weaken the rules that protect our safety, privacy, a...

action.wemove.eu

Gaza has around 20,000 unexploded Israeli bombs amid up to 70 million tonnes of rubble, posing a massive threat to Palestinians, as removal is blocked by Israel’s ban on heavy equipment, according to the Government Media Office. 🔴 LIVE updates: aje.io/m73gl0

Bild

EuroAlternative is a curated collection of the best European alternatives to big tech companies. Keep your data in Europe, support local innovation, simplify business operations. Our directory connects you with EU-based digital service providers. → euroalternative.co

Bild
E

Look at this graph we discussed in my Danish class today. 👀 63% of Danes believe (or believed in 2022) that we must change our lifestyles to resolve the climate crisis. Only 11% believe technology is the solution. Both men and women largely agree in this regard. This is remarkable! 1/2

Diagram 2 Er det nodvendigt at andre vores livsstil, eller kan teknologi
händtere klimaudfordringen?

• Nodvendigt at ændre levevis (1)
• Teknologi kan lose problemerne (2)
• Ingen af disse (3)
• Ved ikke (4)

2018: 
54% (1)
24% (2) 
8% (3)
14% (4)

2022:
63% (1)
11% (2)
11% (3)
15% (4)

Mand
61% (1)
17% (2)
10% (3)
12% (4)

Kvinde:
64% (1)
5% (2)
11% (3)
20% (4)

Kilde: Klimabarometret, Tanketanken Concito, 2022
Kvinde
E

Right now, just a few powerful polluters are holding the whole world hostage - stopping a Plastics Treaty that could protect our health, wildlife, and planet. Join me today and speak up for a strong global policy to protect us from plastic pollution! action.wemove.eu/sign/2025-08...

End the Plastic Era!

Right now, just a few powerful polluters are holding the whole world hostage - stopping a Plastics Treaty that could protect our health, wildlife, and planet. Join me today and speak up for a strong g...

action.wemove.eu

Blue Team Con has a sober board game room with mocktails at the same time as the big party for people who don’t want to be around loud music or alcohol! 🤩 Why doesn’t every con do this?

We now have audited data on water consumption for AI. Over the 18 month lifespan of Mistral Large 2, a 128B model, all water usage (including chats, training; hardware & data centers) took as much water as 678 US households use yearly. Each additional query is 45 mL. (Fixed a conversion error)

BildBild

Ours is the first study to demonstrate an historical increase (by a factor of three!) in the occurrence of atmospheric resonance, which is associated with many of the most devastating and deadly persistent summer weather extremes in recent years (e.g. Pacific Northwest Heat Dome of summer '21) 🧵

Michael E. Mann@michaelemann.bsky.social · last yr.

"Increased frequency of planetary wave resonance events over the past half-century" | Our new article in @pnas.org by @xuekeli.bsky.social, @michaelfwehner.bsky.social, Shannon Christiansen & yours truly: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

I’ve just noticed that, if you don’t want Meta AI to go through slurping up all your WhatsApp messages, you have to go through and turn this on *for every chat you’re in*. Can everyone please move to @signal.org already? This is getting absurd!

Screenshot from WhatsApp:

Advanced chat privacy
• Media won’t be automatically saved to device gallery
• Messages won’t be used for AI features like mentioning @Meta AI
• Chat exports will be disabled

I get annoyed at the narrative that all the awareness and work on climate change hasn't done anything. Yes, global CO₂ emissions indeed continue to climb, but we don't know the counterfactual. When I was in grad school, we were on track for 5°C of warming. Now it's below 3°C. That's progress.

A line chart titled “Annual CO₂ emissions” shows the global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuels and industry from 1950 to 2023. The y-axis represents emissions in billions of tonnes (t), ranging from 0 to 40 billion t. The x-axis covers the years from 1950 to 2023.

The chart presents a steady increase in emissions from approximately 5 billion tonnes in 1950 to over 36 billion tonnes in 2023. Key features include:

A consistent upward trend from 1950 through the early 1970s.

A brief plateau and dip around 1980–1983.

A strong growth trend resuming in the late 1980s.

A sharp increase during the 2000s.

A slight drop around 2008–2009, likely due to the global financial crisis.

A major dip in 2020, attributed to the COVID-19 pandemic.

A rapid rebound in emissions after 2020, continuing the upward trend to a new high in 2023.

A blue line labeled “World” traces these changes over time.

Below the chart, the data source is listed as the Global Carbon Budget (2024), and the graphic is credited to OurWorldInData.org with a Creative Commons license (CC BY). A footnote explains that the data includes emissions from coal, oil, gas, flaring, cement, and steel, but excludes land-use changes such as deforestation.