Alan Walker

@faecalmatters.bsky.social

Professor of gut microbiology. Allegedly grumpy, but actually just Scottish. Messages/rants are my own views, not the University's, obviously.

I still contend that >90% of the benefit of writing a review isn't the audience. It's for the author going through the literature, finding gaps in knowledge, learning how experiments are done, etc. It really isn't about writing a review. It's about doing the review yourself. AI can't do that for you

The landscape of microbial associations in human cancer www.science.org/doi/10.1126/... TLDR -- most cancers do not have microbiomes...but a few do have consistent microbe associations (i.e., colorectal and oral cancers). Make sense!

The landscape of microbial associations in human cancer

Differences between cancer types, infectious disease, and potential prognostic markers are uncovered by studying microbes within cancer DNA.

science.org

Frustrating - I reviewed a paper that was highly problematic, mainly in scientific rigour undermining most of the conclusions, so I recommend Reject. However the editor decides to Revise presumably due to the more positive comments from reviewer 2... /1

Paperboy, turnstile operator, shelf stacker, pipe grinder, pet shop boy, rose breeder, field hand, warehouse dispatcher, and medical laboratory scientific officer (trainee). And I gave it all up for a life of studying poop. It's a strange universe.

Paul Gardner@ppgardne.bsky.social · 2y ago

Introduce yourself with some jobs you have done apart from what you do now: - Farm hand (fencing, thistle cutting, scrub cutting, mustering) - Forestry work (pruning, donkey) - Crutching