Fabian Fröhlich

@frohlichlab.com

Dynamics of Living Systems (https://www.frohlichlab.com) group leader @thecrick.bsky.social Understanding signalling & cell state dynamics through mathematical modelling and machine learning.

Mechanistic ODE models encode pathway topology but are blind to anything outside the pathway. Representation learning compresses data into low-dimensional embeddings but says nothing about mechanism. Deep Mechanistic Models (DMMs) are our attempt at both in one model www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Deep Mechanistic Models reveal pathway-extrinsic drivers of mammary MAPK signalling heterogeneity

Cells sense and respond to their environment through signalling pathways, and the dynamics of these pathways shape cell fate even within genetically identical populations. Two largely separate computa...

biorxiv.org

So, bluesky, where is the discussion of the absolute insane things AI is doing in the realm of mathematics? It seems like we're nearly at the inflection point where the models are as good as human domain experts, and soon may well be better. Is that discourse only happening on twitter?

Using LLMs should allow us to think bigger, harder to grasp, difficult to execute, longer to develop, ideas. That idea that’s been in you brain since forever but you hadn’t had the time because you had to retool and what not. Trust yourself. Go for that shit. Now is the fucking time.

Clément Canonne@ccanonne.github.io · 4d ago

"We're all worried," as what it means to do research (in my field, Theoretical CS) seems to be shifting, and shifting fast. What to do? Senior researchers must lead by example, knowing that not everything will pan out. What I'm suggesting below may not work everywhere, but here's my own advice: 1/

I actually know the answer to this and it's slightly insane. Google pulls from Wikipedia to determine if a place is a city, town, neighbourhood, whatever. Brighton's first line describes it as a "seaside resort" so Google Maps thinks it's a neighbourhood and doesn't display it in the "city" font.

Review/perspective article by Diederik Laman Trip on some of his and our lab's thinking on how we can study human genetics across different levels. In particular around cell-type specific protein interactions, tissue organization and organ morphology. (paywall, shareable link rdcu.be/fvnpz)

Human genetics across levels of biological organization

Nature Reviews Genetics - Genetic variation influences biological processes across scales; however, deciphering how effects propagate from molecules to whole organisms remains a key challenge in...

rdcu.be

New lab preprint - Deep learning models are most often difficult to interpret black box models. What if we engineer them with interpretation in mind? Dennis Gankin carefully studied so-called biologically inspired neural networks and found an interesting phenomenon www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

Leveraging multiplicity in biologically informed neural networks to uncover disease heterogeneity

Biologically inspired neural networks (BINNs) embed pathway, ontology, or protein-interaction structure directly into neural networks, promising interpretable disease prediction where hidden nodes map...

biorxiv.org

3) Best insight I've had from an AI expert: "Anyone who confidently asserts they know where this is all headed is wrong. No-one knows what the world will look like in a couple of years" 3/n

Can we program a kinase like a switch? Inspired by natural autoinhibitory complexes, we designed miniproteins against active- and inactive-like conformations of Focal Adhesion Kinase. Depending on the targeted state, the resulting binders either activated or inhibited the kinase.

Our latest preprint is out. Great collaboration with the group of Jan Hasenauer (University of Bonn). A very comprehensive benchmarking of optimisation methods for parameter estimation in mechanistic models. Preprint in the post below.

bioRxiv SysBio@biorxiv-sysbio.bsky.social · 3w ago

Large-scale analysis of optimisation methods for parameter estimation problems in the life sciences https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.07.11.737731v1

One of the good things about the AI co-scientist brouhaha is that it makes us discuss what science *is*, and how to measure its value, impact, quality. — Questions that have been there all along, but many preferred to gloss over.

Introducing openRxiv Labs! 🔬 Growing from the strong foundation of bioRxiv & medRxiv, Labs is an experimental space for working with collaborators to push the boundaries of open scientific communication. 👉 Check it out and learn more: openrxiv.org/openrxiv-lab... #OpenScience #Preprints #Scicomm

Launching openRxiv Labs - openRxiv

Over the last thirteen years, bioRxiv and medRxiv have grown into widely used infrastructure for rapid research sharing in biology and medicine. The reliability and researcher-first values that have d...

openrxiv.org

The people who believe that generative AI development & adoption everywhere is the ultimate goal & the first order predictor of success are insufferable. So are the people who think that AI can't ever produce anything useful and that everything they do produce is "slop". I miss reasoned arguments.

"a paper today is a Frankensteined-together patchwork of supplementary files that run longer than the manuscript, datasets in repositories...code posted to GitHub without documentation. The paper has been replaced....by a mess" www.thetransmitter.org/from-bench-t...

Is the scientific paper due to be replaced?

AI is pushing scientific publishing to the brink. For neuroscience, the crisis may be an opportunity to finally connect findings across subfields.

thetransmitter.org