hashfyre

@hashfyre.dev

Discordant demi-geek. Makes maps. Eats myths and fantasy. My politics is class politics. Burnt-out Leftist Techie who is probably going to quit being one. Opinions are solemnly mine. http://pronoun.is/he +LSN-ASD

I think we can agree that AI detectors are out. But universities are ignoring the fact that faculty cannot really out-design assessments to meet the challenges of this moment. We need sustained institutional support to be the best teachers we can be, and we aren't getting it.

Inside Higher Ed @insidehighered.com · 10h ago

AI Detectors Are Out, New Assessments Are In A growing number of universities have prohibited AI detectors, arguing they are ‘unreliable’ indicators of cheating. But where does that leave faculty, who know all too well that cheating is rampant in the age of AI? https://bit.ly/4wGitF7 #EDUSky

A photo illustration of three humanoid robots standing in front of a college entrance gateway.

Because it apparently needs to be said: I have never fucking used the AI/LLM/chatbot/plagiarism machine and I never fucking will. If you use it, I think you're a bad person.

Generative AI psychosis and delusion is a real thing, as is the degradation of analytical skills. This increasingly makes conversations difficult with those who have "converted" to using it. Along with the clickbait-ification of everything and the adoption of predatory logarithms. Stay vigilant.

I just saw a case where the lawyer did the research & wrote the brief. No hallucinations. He put it in chat gpt to polish it. Chat gpt changed the citations to include hallucinations & changed the language to make unsupportable claims. AI is too dangerous to use on critical docs.

Academics and scoleres are not gate-keeperes. Thei will talke to you about their topiques. For dayes. Thei will sende lynkes. Thei will order bookes. Thys ys why thei lyve. Thei are the route bitwene past knowledge and future knowledge.