John Drennan

@j-dren.bsky.social

Visiting Fellow, Europe in the World Programme, Egmont Institute | Robert A. Belfer International Affairs Fellow in European Security, Council on Foreign Relations | Nonresident Fellow, Transatlantic Dialogue Center

"NATO 3.0 fails not because it asks Europeans to do more, but because it never defines what they are supposed to do more of, or why," Council Vice President of Research for Security and Defense @atabatabai.bsky.social and @j-dren.bsky.social write in @lawfaremedia.org. More analysis ⤵️

NATO 3.0: A Tagline in Search of a Concept

Force Posture Decisions Have Become Another Coercive Tool in the Trump Administration’s Alliance Management Toolkit

lawfaremedia.org

"NATO 3.0 fails not because it asks Europeans to do more, but because it never defines what they are supposed to do more of, or why, and because it has made force posture an instrument of political coercion rather than strategic planning," writes @j-dren.bsky.social and @atabatabai.bsky.social.

NATO 3.0: A Tagline in Search of a Concept

Force Posture Decisions Have Become Another Coercive Tool in the Trump Administration’s Alliance Management Toolkit

lawfaremedia.org

For this second installment in our @lawfaremedia.org series on Trump's coercive approach to NATO, @j-dren.bsky.social & I look at how Russia views the tensions within the alliance. The acute phase of the Greenland crisis may be over (for now), but Russia will keep benefiting from it.

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org · 7mo ago

While the internal crisis within NATO over Greenland appears to have passed, the damage to the alliance's cohesion may have lasting impact—and directly benefit Russia. @j-dren.bsky.social and @atabatabai.bsky.social explore the resulting short- and long-term effects of the crisis.

This is the first in a series of @lawfaremedia.org articles @j-dren.bsky.social and I have coming out that look at the implications of the administration's coercive approach to alliances in general and NATO in particular. Stay tuned:

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org · 8mo ago

The Trump administration's continued attacks on NATO may cause long term damage to U.S. security if allies downgrade their cooperation with the U.S. @j-dren.bsky.social and @atabatabai.bsky.social explain the benefits that NATO allies provide that would significantly harm U.S. security if lost.

On Lawfare Daily, @atabatabai.bsky.social spoke to John Drennan and Matthew Sharp about New START, the last bilateral nuclear arms control treaty between the United States and Russia, the implications of its expiration in Feb. 2026, and where the arms control regime might go from here.