Ariane Tabatabai

@atabatabai.bsky.social

Vice President of Research for Security & Defense at Chicago Council on Global Affairs • Contributing Editor at Lawfare • Ex Pentagon & State Department • Author of No Conquest, No Defeat (Oxford University Press) & co-author of Triple Axis (Bloomsbury)

"American leaders have long treated Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea as separate challenges," the Council's @atabatabai.bsky.social and @egmontinstitute.bsky.social's John Drennan write in @time.com. "The US-Israel war with Iran exposed once again the folly of that approach." Read more ⤵️

How America’s Adversaries Have Stopped Fighting Alone

The war with Iran has made it clear that America’s adversaries are increasingly acting as a coordinated bloc.

time.com

"I think President Trump had overestimated how much he could achieve militarily," Council Vice President of Research @atabatabai.bsky.social tells @npr.org of the US war with Iran. "I think Iran might now be overestimating what it can achieve diplomatically based on the cycle that we're in."

Trump says the U.S. and Iran have agreed on a deal

NPR's Ayesha Rascoe speaks to Ariane Tabatabai of the the Chicago Council on Global Affairs about potential offramps from the war available to the U.S. and Iran.

n.pr

Good to sit down with Libby Berry from @global-affairs.bsky.social to discuss where things stand with Russia's war on Ukraine, what the rest of Europe can learn from Ukraine's defence tech ecosystem, and where Ukraine goes from here. Read the interview here: globalaffairs.org/commentary/a...

How Russia's War on Ukraine is Reshaping Europe's Defense Strategy

The conflict offers lessons for how to bolster European security with less support from the United States.

globalaffairs.org

Exactly this. Obviously, first and foremost, the human cost of this war should be the focus. (2 more service members today and how many civilians?) But also, we need to talk about the readiness impact of this war and how long (and how much $) it’ll take to rebuild after these choices.

Caroline Baxter@convergingriskslab.bsky.social · 2w ago

Training and maintenance are readiness bedrock, generated deliberately over time. And DoD, having now jackhammered that bedrock til the house started collapsing, will spend a generation - during an unstable moment - recreating what took five months to lose. www.washingtonpost.com/national-sec...

So we are: 1. Terminating all sanctions on Iran, including human rights designations; 2. Deporting Iranian asylum seekers to a country engaging in mass repression; 3. AND sharing info on said individuals so they get detained, tortured, and possibly killed upon return?! www.npr.org/2026/07/07/g...

New lawsuit alleges US shared asylum application details with Iran

A lawsuit alleges the Trump administration is divulging details of Iranian asylum seekers to the government of Iran.

npr.org

"NATO 3.0 fails not because it asks Europeans to do more, but because it never defines what they are supposed to do more of, or why, and because it has made force posture an instrument of political coercion rather than strategic planning," writes @j-dren.bsky.social and @atabatabai.bsky.social.

NATO 3.0: A Tagline in Search of a Concept

Force Posture Decisions Have Become Another Coercive Tool in the Trump Administration’s Alliance Management Toolkit

lawfaremedia.org

This here is really great work. It’s putting in numbers, black on white, what we have known for a while: that the admin’s stated objectives for and goal posts in the conflict have been shifting throughout the war. And that’s apparent in the poor planning for the war and this agreement.

Laura Jedeed@laurajedeed.bsky.social · 2mo ago

When Trump went to war with Iran, I watched every speech anyone in the administration gave and made a chart of every reason given for going to war "Eliminate ballistic capability" was the #1 reason given: more even than preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon

The US and Iran reached a deal — but "we don't really know a whole lot," says Council VP of Research @atabatabai.bsky.social. The nuclear issue, Iran's proxy support, and its ballistic missile program are all unresolved. Now a 60-day clock is ticking to work it out. bit.ly/4fMIBsc

The United States and Iran Reach a Deal but Agree to Little

Trump celebrated his 80th birthday with a UFC fight and a preliminary deal with Iran, kicking off a 60-day clock for negotiations.

globalaffairs.org

If this is the text of the MOU with Iran, it is an absolute disaster. Iran gives almost nothing, the U.S. makes many concessions. This is what happens when Congress goes MIA, and people with no experience and understating of the issues run the show. www.cnn.com/2026/06/17/m...

Read the 14-point draft agreement between the US and Iran | CNN

The agreement between Iran and the US lays out the terms of the ceasefire between the bitter rivals, the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, some financial relief for Iran and a reiteration from Tehran...

cnn.com

Trump keeps saying this war and agreement are about Iran never acquiring a nuclear weapon, except that the interim deal signed this week as reported doesn’t seem to be that concerned with the nuclear issue. There are few details (none, really) on what we’re limiting and how we’re verifying it.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 2mo ago

Trump: "This agreement is about one thing -- that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon. Never ever ever. The rest of it is irrelevant, frankly."

Exactly this. There is a reason why we typically spell out agreement provisions in detailed legalese. That’s especially true with an adversary like Iran with a history of covert activities in violation of its international obligations.

Jon B. Wolfsthal@jonatomic.bsky.social · 2mo ago

As someone who has negotiated with Iran, been to Iran and worked to prevent a nuclear Iran for over 30 years I can tell you, if it is not in the text, it is not agreed to. Release the text.