@janetsiegmund.bsky.social

Occasionally, I get a reviewer complaining, “You don’t compare against any other approach. So how can we know you’re better?” So I found a simple way to still add the "bold number column" that apparently everybody wants these days.

Table with three columns: one "other approaches", all with 0%; one "our approach", with bold, non-zero percentages; and one "improvement", showing infinite improvement in all cases.

On my way to Ottawa for #ICSE2025. I will be presenting our paper on Programming Language Learning Transfer on Monday at CSEE&T, and on Wednesday, I am presenting my journal article on Programmer's Block at the main conference. Looking forward to seeing you there :D

It is so great to see artifact evaluation as a peer review method for research artifacts to slowly make its way into other fields. We need to check not only the words but the experiments themselves to build reliable science.

Alejandro Coca-Castro@alejo-coca.bsky.social · 2y ago

What does Artifact Evaluation mean for the computational #climatescience community? The blog post below summarises a pioneering initiative that some of us in @climformatics.bsky.social embarked on to embed more #reproducibility and #fairsoftware in climate research. Please share 🙏

✨Exciting news! Dominik Gorgosch, @norbertsiegmund.bsky.social, Janet Siegmund and my paper '"Ok Pal, We Have to Code That Now": Interaction Patterns of Programming Beginners with a Conversational' Chatbot has been accepted in EMSE Journal! Ever wondered how beginners use AI to learn programming?⬇︎︎

Bild