In other words, state-mandated lists of books are little better than big box scripted curriculum because they both suffer from the same fundamental flaw: attempting to studentproof and teacherproof the classroom. I’m all for “whole books,” but there’s a point at which it also becomes illiberal.
While a primary problem in English classes is that standards often have primacy over content, meaning students are often confined to predictable, decodable texts, mandated book lists are not the solution to this issue. Trusting teachers and students is. www.nytimes.com/2026/08/03/o...