John Benning

@jbenning.bsky.social

humanist, scientist, optimist | assistant professor, Cornell EEB johnbenning.net

I say we start by making it less financially appealing. We need a ruthless anti-scam administration. A total crackdown on robocalls, MLMs, crytpo scams, get rich quick influencers, and fake supplement companies. Steep penalties and enforcement structures with teeth.

I have been following the discussion around how best to represent and label human genetic variation, and thought it might also be worth discussing an aspect of the broader context. 1/n

New from @jedidiahcarlson.com and I, and with a personal guarantee that there are no AI images. We discuss conceptual and methodological practices in mainstream human genetics that contribute to misappropriation by scientific racists through their own fringe counter-research & online memes.

Frontiers | Typological thinking in human genomics research contributes to the production and prominence of scientific racism

<p>Public genomic datasets like the 1000 Genomes project (1KGP), Human Genome Diversity Project (HGDP), and the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD)...

frontiersin.org

PSA for ppl sympathetic to hereditarian arguments: it should give you pause that of the academics ascribing to genetic determinism, few are biologists. Exceedingly few are experimental biologists. It's v hard to believe simplistic genetic narratives once you actually... 1/

Defining fitness in evolutionary ecology A primer we hope will be of use to all learners! #evolution #plantscience 🧪🌍🌎🌏

International Journal of Plant Sciences@ijpsjournal.bsky.social · 3y ago

JA and OA @ijpsjournal.bsky.social Primers on the Plant Sciences: Defining fitness in evolutionary ecology @smwadgymar.bsky.social, @seemasheth.bsky.social, @emjo.bsky.social, Megan deMarche, Jill Anderson www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/epdf/10.... #PlantScience

New record: 24 referee invitations on a single ms, with only one accepted. And this is for a "big name journal". If you submit manuscripts, you must review manuscripts. How many? See formula below. (Yes, resubmissions and revisions count in the number of submissions.)

The number of reviews you owe science this year is greater than or equal to the sum, over your submissions this year (indexed by "i"), of the product of (1) your fractional contribution to submission "i", and (2) the number of reviews you received on submission "i".