Josep Mercadal

@josepmercadal.bsky.social

Physicist attempting biology. Postdoc at the MPIPZ Cologne. Interested in development, evolution, and philosophy. He/him.

Excuse my squishy fleshy brain, but I cannot fathom how one can write bullshit like: "Conventional research papers require readers to understand and adapt the paper’s code, data and methods to their work, creating barriers to dissemination and reuse." and get away with it.

Will someone please teach science journalists at the NYT that human behavioral genetics is 99% bullshit? A better headline for this piece would be "Psychologists Posing as Geneticists Played With Some Statistical Software." www.nytimes.com/2026/09/03/s...

Scientists Find More Than 1,000 Genetic Variants Linked to Personality

More than one million genomes helped identify DNA variants linked to extroversion, agreeableness, neuroticism and more. Researchers measured how those traits influenced how people lived.

nytimes.com

What do we make of the statement that 1260 ‘genetic variants’ account for between 4.8%-9.3% of our personality? www.nature.com/articles/s41.... If you believe, as most media has, that our personality is genetically determined, you are gullible. 1/3🧵

Robust inference and correlates from genetic associations with personality - Nature

The genetic architecture of personality is robustly generalizable, minimally confounded and widely relevant to human experience.

nature.com

I think the tech press bears an enormous amount of blame for this because they continue to cover Musk's announcements as "Maverick CEO Says Thing" rather than "Nazi Says Thing" and a lot of people take that level of normalcy as a signal that he's not really that bad

Dr. Samantha Hancox-Li@sjshancoxli.liberalcurrents.com · last mo.

i do think a lot of mainstreamers have missed the ball on how musk has moved past "rich guy with funny opinions on race science" and into "literally just a nazi"

As a modeller, it’s sometimes hard to convey the idea that adding complexity to our models (ostensibly making them more realistic) doesn’t necessarily give us more explanatory power. This paper makes that point clear by arguing why simpler models are often more illuminating. Congrats to the authors!

Alejandro Fábregas-Tejeda@alejandrofabregastejeda.com · 2mo ago

As simulations grow in complexity, a set of non-trivial issues emerge: diminished identifiability as free parameters become too numerous relative to exp. constraints & difficulties grasping causality. In our new 📄, we point to potential avenues to move #CellBio forward 👇 arxiv.org/abs/2608.06998

New 📄 🚨! #CellBio is teeming with simulations comprising an extraordinarily high number of components. We argue that model complexity will not automatically lead to a better understanding of biological systems & discuss how modeling practices could be repurposed: arxiv.org/abs/2608.06998 #philsci

Simulating is not always understanding: When model complexity obscures biology

In cell biology, computational models of biological systems range from minimal representations with a handful of parameters to whole-cell simulations tracking thousands of molecular species across a c...

arxiv.org

A phenomenon I've noticed recently is people trying to occupy some untenable middleground wrt to the use of systems sold as "AI" -- this is a position where people try to recognize the harms of this tech but also hold space for "responsible" or "ethical" use. 🧵>>

Enter the oldest known fossil liverwort, Metzgeriothallus sharonae (ca. 388 Ma). These exceptionally well-preserved fossils allow us to distinguish different cell types. Dark cells (homologs of oil body cells of modern liverworts) form salt-and-pepper patterns, a hallmark of lateral inhibition.

Pictures of M. sharonae, the oldest fossil liverwort, displaying very well-preserved dark cells forming salt-and-pepper patterns, a hallmark of lateral inhibition.

I've developed a strong aversion to AI-generated slides in presentations. They look so ugly, and seem to discourage economy in how ideas are presented. Indeed, the problems are akin to those for AI text: the hard work of creation is bypassed, and it shows.

When did liverwort oil body cells originate? Here, Susan and I provide quantitative evidence that they emerged by at least the Middle Devonian (~390 Ma!), shedding light on a key anti-herbivory defense mechanism of early land plants!

New Phytologist@newphyt.bsky.social · 4mo ago

Homology of the dark cells of Paleozoic liverworts with the specialized oil body cells of modern liverworts (Marchantiophyta) Tremblay and Mercadal nph.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/share/BWYYSE...

Examples of oil bodies of extant liverworts of the Jungermanniopsida (Bazzania sp., Riccardia chamedryfoli, and Pallavicinia sp.), Marchantiopsida (Conocephalum sp., Marchantia polymorpha) and Haplomitriopsida (Treubia lacunosa and Haplomitrium sp.) and dark cells of Devonian liverworts Pallaviciniites devonicus and Metzgeriothallus sharonae.

It's always a little funny to run into "keep politics out of paleontology!" sentiment. Because hey guess what about all those dinosaur bones stolen from other nations, lands, and countries since the inception of the field?

Our past creates our present: a brief overview of racism and colonialism in Western paleontology | Paleobiology | Cambridge Core

Our past creates our present: a brief overview of racism and colonialism in Western paleontology - Volume 48 Issue 2

cambridge.org