Jake Werner

@jwdwerner.bsky.social

Historian, director for East Asia @quincyinst.bsky.social, cofounder Justice Is Global. Previously @gdp-center.bsky.social, University of Chicago. Writing on US–China relations and global capitalism.

Confused about #climatefinance? Our new resource @nrdc.org provides a snapshot of progress towards the four globally agreed goals: 1️⃣$1.3tn all intl flows by 2035 2️⃣$300bn mobilized by 2035 3️⃣3x #UNFCCC fund outflows by 2030 4️⃣3x adaptation finance by 2035 We'll update with new data as it comes out.

International Climate Finance Goals Tracker

This tracker collates data on progress toward the four globally agreed-upon climate finance goals.

nrdc.org

The campaign to discredit China’s lending in the Global South worked because Americans don’t know the US record is so similar. But it won’t have the same effect when everyone has already experienced these same supposedly Chinese abuses at the hands of the US tech companies.

Isaac Stone Fish twitter post, https://x.com/isaacstonefish/status/2080299341516837235

The core problem with Biden foreign policy was its hardening of geopolitical blocs. Rejecting a global reform agenda to open positive-sum possibilities, they drove up geopolitical pressures in all regions. These people must never return to power, but so too the whole approach.

Jake Werner@jwdwerner.bsky.social · 2w ago

Cold War liberals arming US allies were often uncomfortable with the torture and mass murder. They accepted complicity to maintain geopolitical blocs. Likewise the Biden people took part in endless atrocities in Gaza because they refused peace with Iran. www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...

Cold War liberals arming US allies were often uncomfortable with the torture and mass murder. They accepted complicity to maintain geopolitical blocs. Likewise the Biden people took part in endless atrocities in Gaza because they refused peace with Iran. www.newyorker.com/magazine/202...

How Biden Enabled Israel’s Aggression Toward Gaza—and Iran

Top officials from the previous Administration now express regret over their failure to rein in Netanyahu.

newyorker.com

Glad to see this getting attention. But where we take it makes a world of difference. The point isn’t new: I’ve been making it for a decade, and that was based on heterodox pol econ literature of the 80s–90s. But it was inadmissible under neoliberal hegemony. Why the change? 1/

Bild

A few years ago the distinction between productive and speculative investment was coming back, but serving Biden’s geopolitical conflict. Rackets like below are everywhere now. Let’s land productive vs predatory investment as the distinction—it’s about human needs not international domination.

Text from an FT column by Sujeet Indap, 2026.06.23:

“For some of my cold-blooded business school classmates, their nascent scepticism about private equity comes from perhaps an unlikely source: the Wall Street takeover of the sports their kids play.

“To support their children in their athletic endeavours, they have faced new and escalating costs for everything from fancy uniforms to being pushed towards video recordings of games, the latter costing parents hundreds of dollars when they could just use their own iPhones. Parents tell stories of being charged to watch games, to have their child try out for teams or pay for parking at matches.”

The Supreme Court ALSO gives Trump another pass on racism, declaring that his horrific and bigoted comments against Haitians are actually not evidence of racism and that the plaintiffs cannot show evidence of racial bias, essentially plugging their ears and letting Trump spew filth as policy.

The Court assumes for the sake of argument that heightened scrutiny applies and that it must determine whether a “discriminatory purpose [was] a motivating factor in the decision” to terminate Haiti’s TPS
designation, Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development
Corp., 429 U. S. 252, 265–266. Because application of that standard
calls for consideration of the context in which a challenged statement
was made, id., at 267–268, the immigration context is an important
factor.
None of the cited statements by either the President or the Secretary
was overtly racial, and in substance all expressed policy views that
could rest on race-neutral justifications. Viewing all the relevant evidence, Miot respondents are unlikely to prove that race was a motivating factor in the decision to terminate Haiti’s TPS designation, and it
follows that they are not entitled to interim relief on their equal protection claim. Pp. 20–24

BREAKING: The Supreme Court rules 6-3 in favor of the Trump admin on Temporary Protected Status, blocking the lawsuit on jurisdictional grounds, allowing DHS to strip over 350,000 people of legal status even though they utterly failed to follow the required legal procedures.

MULLIN v. DOE
Syllabus
that the termination of Haiti’s TPS designation violated the constitutional right to equal protection because it was motivated by race. The
District Court granted interim relief, and a divided D. C. Circuit panel
declined to issue a stay. The Government sought a stay and a writ of
certiorari before judgment in both cases. This Court granted review,
consolidated the cases, and deferred ruling on the stay applications.
Held:
1. The TPS statute bars judicial review of non-constitutional claims.
Pp. 12–18.
(a) Section 1254a(b)(5)(A) provides that “[t]here is no judicial review
of any determination of the [Secretary of Homeland Security] with respect to the designation, or termination or extension of a designation,
of a foreign state.” The term “determination” may mean either an individual decision or the process leading to a decision. Under either
understanding, §1254a(b)(5)(A) bars all of respondents’ non-constitutional claims. Further, the phrase “with respect to” “generally has a
broadening effect, ensuring that the scope of a provision covers not
only its subject but also matters relating to that subject.” Patel v. Garland, 596 U. S. 328, 339 (internal quotation marks omitted). Pp. 12–
13.

On @ezraklein.bsky.social, @mattduss.bsky.social plants the flag: • Progressive FP’s precondition is to break with Biden personnel and their aim of reviving US hegemony • Its substance is solidarity: reform so different nationalities are not pitted against each other, so all workers enjoy security

Matt Duss@mattduss.bsky.social · 2mo ago

We need a new US foreign policy that promotes peace and solidarity Mu conversation with @ezraklein.bsky.social @nytopinion.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com/2026/06/09/o...

That Trump II used Hegseth's D-Day address to advance its racist and revisionist fallacies in the pettiest of ways is a cowardly political offense to its European allies. That it is using the World Cup to do so is a cowardly political offense to the world and to international sports.

AFP News Agency@en.afp.com · 2mo ago

Award-winning Somali referee Omar Artan, set to be the first from his country to officiate at the World Cup, was denied entry to the United States, a sports ministry official told AFP on Monday u.afp.com/SDH9

This is silly but should be taken seriously. It’s a warning. Want to reform anything in our oligarchy? Then they’ll denounce you as a Chinese stooge. Geopolitical conflict always reinforces domestic hierarchies. Shame on those who indulge it. @jeffstein.bsky.social: www.notus.org/congress/way...

Republicans Are Investigating Anti-Data-Center Nonprofits Over Their China Ties

The House Ways and Means Committee chair said nonprofits are trying to “sow discord and chaos within the American citizenry” to China’s benefit.

notus.org

In @thenation.com, my thoughts on the Trump–Xi summit. Some hopeful possibilities, but it was more notable for dramatizing the miserable choice US elites want to force on us: unsound peace or unfettered confrontation. www.thenation.com/article/worl...

An Alternative View of What’s Next After the Trump-Xi Summit

Hawkish rhetoric from the national security establishment isn’t grappling with the complex challenges posed by China’s rise.

thenation.com

There are 2 big stories in development happening in Africa @katemac.bsky.social (1) LEAPFROGGING: Africa is buying huge quantities of solar panels. Electricity access is accelerating growth (2) MAKING not just BUYING: some countries got FDI. Starting to capture value-added & jobs from manufacturing

Dave Jones@cleanpowerdave.bsky.social · 3mo ago

There's 4 key countries which these cells+wafers are exported to: Ethiopia, Tanzania, Kenya and Nigeria. That's a LOT of manfacturing capacity that's come online in the last months. Some of the panels will be for export, but many will likely be used domestically.

I joined @tobitac.bsky.social talking to @redandinexpert.bsky.social on where US–China relations stand in the glorious new era of constructive strategic stability.

Politics Theory Other@poltheoryother.bsky.social · 3mo ago

🇨🇳🇺🇸 NEW EPISODE 🇨🇳🇺🇸 - @tobitac.bsky.social and @jwdwerner.bsky.social on where US-China relations stand after the Beijing summit. We talked tariffs, Taiwan, and potential future crises that might worsen relations between the two most powerful states in the global system:

I have a letter in @financialtimes.com on Ely Ratner’s op-ed, where he joined other Biden alums calling for confrontation with China. Parts were cut, and I wanted to post one line in particular since the case for US–China conflict relies heavily on the idea that in this world only one can thrive:

Image of the headline of a Financial Times letter to the editor, Jake Werner, “Letter: A vision of US-China ties that’s better than zero-sum”, 2026.05.18