Jeff Lockhart

@jwlockhart.bsky.social

Cat person. Sometimes sociologist of science, sex, & other stuff.

Sherry Turkle has some great interviews about this from the 80s. Men who preferred tinkering with computers over dating because they knew women were humans with their own desires who have autonomy and deserve respect. E.g. they might not agree on a restaurant, and these men had no desire to impose.

Berna Devezer@devezer.bsky.social · 6d ago

no one is promised easy answers, unmistakeable telltales, happy endings. we do not have a right to demand interaction or connection. even utmost kindness, sensitivity, humility, openness, patience, effort, and compromises can't entitle you to a relationship. you don't treat humans like commodities.

Any big-budget Wittgenstein film should be 75% Wittgenstein being an unremitting asshole to everyone he meets, with the director varying whether only we think the target deserves it, 23% him being terrible to himself, and then 2% this specific moment, which is unexpectedly the heart of the film.

After about two hours of reading or discussion, we would go for a walk and then have tea at Lyons, or in the restaurant above the Regal cinema. Sometimes he came to my house in Searle Street for supper. Once after supper, Wittgenstein, my wife, and I went for a walk on Midsummer Common. We talked about the movements of the bodies of the solar system. It occurred to Wittgenstein that the three of us should represent the movements of the sun, earth, and moon, relative to one another. My wife was the sun and maintained a steady pace across the meadow; I was the earth and circled her at a trot. Wittgenstein took the most strenuous part of all, the moon, and ran around me while I circled my wife. Wittgenstein entered into this game with great enthusiasm and seriousness, shouting instructions at us as he ran. He became quite breathless and dizzy with exhaustion.
Brett Karlan@oldjerryfodor.bsky.social · last wk.

Bro if Christopher Nolan ever directs a big-budget retelling of the Wittgenstein-Popper poker incident, imma write a review in the LRB that is SO scathing

I do think chatbots have radically altered people's sense of lying and cheating. Students who would never pay someone to write an essay happily pay a bot. Lawyers and academics who wouldn't otherwise fabricate evidence shrug and say "oops" if a bot does it for them.

Gabriel Malor@gabrielmalor.bsky.social · 4w ago

11th Cir.: Counsel, you responded to opposing counsel pointing out you filed a brief with eight hallucinated cases by filing a reply brief purporting to withdraw eight *different* hallucinated cases. You are referred for misconduct. Good day, sir. media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub...

acknowledged in his (untimely) proposed reply brief that those citations were “erroneous or unverifiable,” and sought to withdraw his reliance on eight listed cases.6  At this point, things go from bad to worse: the eight cases Sabatini “withdrew” did not match a single one of the eight hallucinated cases in his opening brief.  And not only were they not the right cases—all eight were also hallucinated.