Kabanaw

@kabanaweso.me

He/Him. I'm Kabanaw. I make music stuff in a big video game you've probably heard of. I don't really stream much anymore but pretty often guest on Pit Crew stuff!

I do understand this feeling, but I think it's also worth pointing out: These tools have absolutely zero evidence that they are capable of making good games, only evidence they're good at making mediocre to bad copycats. Yes, they're causing a ton of damage now, but now isn't forever.

Brenda Romero@brendaromero.bsky.social · last wk.

A recent programming graduate who is currently working in the game industry described the grief she feels for the career she thought she was going to have. She loves to code, and she doesn’t want to surrender that in whole or in part to a tool, even if she understands its utility. “I am grieving.”

Spookum's Week starts in a scant 108 hours. In 4 and a half days. I have a ton of things prepared and ready to go. It's my favorite time of the year and some of the best stuff I do all year. Minimum of 80 hours for the last week of October. Be there for a great time! docs.google.com/spreadsheets...

A streaming schedule for the last week of October, the same linked in the post.

One annoying thing about this is the way that it's treated as a purely moral/ethical stance and not a matter of taste. I have very little interest in games that use AI not just because of the ethics, but simply because I am much less interested in creative works that used it!

Aura/Moom@moomanibe.bsky.social · 2w ago

I'll be honest, there is nothing more demoralizing to me than devs saying "I know AI is built on theft, and anti-labour, and harms the environment, but I'm going to use it anyway bc I don't believe individual choices matter". This is how a movement fails. www.molleindustria.org/blog/future-...

I admire and support developers that commit to an AI-free practice. It’s the only truly ethical position at this point, and has innumerable cognitive and creative benefits. But it can’t be the only path forward. Individual choices and consumer-side battles have delivered very few victories on the environment, GMOs, health, labor, or human rights. If the problems with AI are related to energy and water use, IP theft, cheating, unemployment, spam, and so on, we have to address them as such. Energy consumption wouldn’t be as much as a problem if we used renewables; IP theft wouldn’t be as grave if we all benefited from these remixing machines; unemployment is a capitalist feature not an AI one. In other words, we need structural changes in all these domains and democratic control over these technologies.
“The problem is capitalism” is not an excuse for inaction, but a reminder that holding your fellow artists to the highest ethical standards won’t stop the actual bad actors. You might have more leverage to change things by starting with your own progressively minded community, but it can come at a high cost of division, suspicion, and bad vibes.
Like everyone who lives in front of a computer, I have so much more to say about generative AI, but I’ll probably just wait for the bubble to pop.

Final morning of solo parenting, the child has decided she wanted to wake up at 5 am. Tried getting her back to sleep but it seems like it'll just be a half hour of quiet rest, back to it

I think one of the most frustrating aspects of "but actually AI is actual useful for things now" is how quickly some people will abandon principled stances against something when there's something in it for them

One point brought up in this that I don't quite understand is how more compute == more income. Is there currently a bottleneck for consumers? I don't think I've ever seen someone complain that claude is currently backed up and can't fill their request

Ed Zitron@edzitron.com · 3w ago

Today's newsletter is about how the AI bubble is inflated on the basis of made-up numbers that don't tell us anything, but serve to distract from the the fact that we have no actual information about the industry's financials. www.wheresyoured.at/annualized-e...

There is such a massive gulf between what AI can do as a code assistant and what it can do as a code generator and I think how positively you think of its abilities is how much you conflate them. Either that or I don't think your ability to evaluate code is terribly good

My daughter has been interested in using my water bottle lately and it's very cute and hold on why are my tonsils swollen

AI shit is so bad for my anxiety. On the one hand, you have lots of studies showing little to no productivity gains, but those are often somewhat out of date, and it has gotten _less_ shitty. On the other hand, people will report crazy gains using it but AI has always left people feeling like that

I think, if I’m being honest with myself, this is the main reason I refuse to touch these things. More so than being environmentally dilligent, even more so than wanting to avoid being a thief. I am very good at my job. I enjoy being very good at my job. I do not want to become less good at my job

I've seen a lot of programmers really disrespect themselves thinking that genAI is "fine" when it comes to coding or w/e because it's not "art" Programming is an art. It requires creativity. And you're literally programming graphics, it's visual art. It's just art. It counts. AI coding is AI "art"

VRChat@vrchat.com · 4w ago

Let's talk about AI in VRChat. Be sure to fill out the Google form at the bottom of the article. ask.vrchat.com/t/regarding-...

one thing you learn from making a lot of things is that the nitty gritty details, the millions of tiny invisible decisions, ARE the art. The "higher level ideas" are not nearly as important or interesting

Freya Holmér@freya.bsky.social · last mo.

"AI lets you focus on the higher level ideas!!" because we all grew up dreaming of becoming managers and CEOs we all know the real artists at the very highest level are the shareholders, famously full of amazing ideas