Katelynn Vogt

@katelynnvogt.bsky.social

VP for Comms, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Posts about foreign policy.. and women's soccer. Hill alum. Loves pets, politics, and Philly sports. Follow: @carnegieendowment.org

We’re delighted to announce Avril Haines as the next president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. One of the most respected national security leaders of her generation, Avril brings a deep commitment to public service and the values at the heart of our mission.

Bild

The best thing I've read on the new information ecosystem. (And a great gateway for people whose influence is based on traditional expertise/credentials. It's by the Carnegie Endowment! There are footnotes!)

Renee DiResta@noupside.bsky.social · 11mo ago

Last week @rachelkleinfeld.bsky.social and I put out a provocation & set of suggestions on how influence has changed and why institutions (& funders) need to change their thinking on shaping public opinion and connecting w/audiences. The old way no longer works. carnegieendowment.org/research/202...

Great to see 'THE NEW NUCLEAR AGE' reviewed in the @financialtimes.com: "Panda’s critique will land like a bucket of cold water on those who view nuclear as humanity’s last best hope for energy and see atomic confrontation as a thing of the past." www.ft.com/content/7fec...

The perils and promise of our new nuclear age

As net zero goals revive the push for atomic power, could it light the way or lead to disaster? Three timely books explore the possibilities

ft.com

Karim Sadjadpour is a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, specializing in Iran and U.S. foreign policy, and he was my guest on an emergency episode of The Prof G Pod.

If a ceasefire takes hold I'm relieved. But this war could prove a disaster for nonproliferation. The Iranian regime has key nuclear capabilities intact--including a HIGHLY ENRICHED URANIUM stockpile--every reason to build the bomb. Me in @politico.com . www.politico.com/news/magazin...

Opinion | JD Vance Said the Iran Strikes Set Their Nuclear Program Back ‘Substantially.’ He’s Wrong.

The strikes probably only delayed Iran’s nuclear ambitions — and reinvigorated them.

politico.com

In the @nytimes.com today, I argue that the United States should judge military action against Iran by the same standards against which the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action--aka the Iran Nuclear Deal--was assessed. GIFT LINK at end of thread. (1/7)

Bild

.@nktpnd.bsky.social and I argue in The Boston Globe: The U.S. has an interest in preventing a nuclear Iran—but that’s not what this war is about anymore. It’s becoming a campaign for regime change, and the U.S. should resist being dragged into this war. 🧵

Knowing what I know, I don't see these strikes meaningfully putting Iran's program back (I suppose you can quibble about what meaningful constitutes for Netanyahu). Iran will strike back and odds of a political choice to leave the NPT/take other steps have gone up.