Kate Baxter-Kauf

@kbaxterk.bsky.social

Class action & privacy lawyer at Lockridge Grindal Nauen. Abortion, debate access, & Central HS / St. Paul neighborhood volunteer. Lover of books, the West Wing & Feminist T-Shirt Friday. she/hers

Based on the overwhelming consensus that I’ve heard in both public feedback and private conversations from government officials, service providers, encampment residents, and public health experts, I do not believe we are prepared to responsibly close the encampments beginning tomorrow.

St. Paul prepares to clear homeless encampment amid questions

On July 8, citing a growing number of fires, fatal overdoses and reported sexual assaults, St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her announced plans to close the city’s three largest homeless encampments on a rolling...

twincities.com

With the caveat that there's a minefield of gender-dynamic issues at play here (both in the specific allegations against Her, and her response thereof)...I don't see how, on a functional level, this lasts a full term. Just omnidirectional alienating vibes emanating from the mayor's office. Bad stuff

Kyle Stokes@kystokes.bsky.social · yesterday

Scoop: In a private call with top officials, St. Paul Mayor Kaohly Her lashed at requests to delay a homeless encampment sweep. She attributed her anger to “fuckery” being said about her in public, 3 officials told @axios.com . One state rep logged off in frustration. www.axios.com/local/twin-c...

My question tangentially related to the Mayor Her stuff: the announcement about closing encampments came after the April investigation started. Is there a relationship between them and what is it? No one I know is pro the closure but my understanding is the SPPD may be.

SNELLING AVE PALS, there is another public meeting tomorrow (Weds) at 6PM over Zoom. Register here and learn more about MNDOT’s plans for this corridor: talk.dot.state.mn.us/snelling-mon...

Meetings and events

Public meetings and eventsUpcomingInformation on upcoming meetings will be posted as details become available. Sign up for email updates to receive information on upcoming meetings and opportunities t...

talk.dot.state.mn.us

Ryan Ricard@firewally.bsky.social · 2w ago

I was pleasantly surprised by the @mndot.mn.gov public meeting on Snelling Ave last night - staff consistently re-iterated their intent to make meaningful safety improvements here for walking/biking/transit. Learn more and Respond here! talk.dot.state.mn.us/snelling-mon...

"if wealth and political access can indefinitely relitigate a finished public decision, every safety project in every Minnesota city inherits the playbook — and every taxpayer inherits the legal bills and the cost of delay." Erik Noonan of @bikemn.bsky.social understands the stakes of Summit Ave.

Counterpoint: The math against the Summit Avenue trail doesn’t work; democracy, however, does

“A small, affluent, politically connected group has spent over three years using endless lawsuits, public records fights and opinion pages to relitigate a public decision that has already been made — ...

twincities.com

Please pause a minute and consider how much money municipalities spend on displacing and hurting people, destroying what few possessions they have (including ID documents and in-process paperwork for help), disconnecting them from community and aids to climb out of their situation... 1/3

Sanctuary Supply Depot@supplydepotmpls.bsky.social · 4w ago

This is NOT how we treat our neighbors. No one involved has been able to answer what "alternative housing" will be available for the people they are intentionally displacing in preparation for a Minnesota winter. Shelters are full, and not every shelter is suited for every person... Please help 💕💸

No matter what the Supreme Court says, No matter how hard the fascists cling to power, we will fight for all our trans community. Sports are integral to youth community and development and cannot be denied to our trans kids.

This is the nut of it. If trans women don't have access to equal protection under the law, then they essentially are a second-class citizen who cannot depend on the protection or rights afforded cisgender counterparts. Trans men likewise just don't exist under the law.

ElieNYC@elienyc.bsky.social · last mo.

See, people always want to make this just about "sports," but the real upshot here is that, 6-3, trans women can't make a claim under the Equal Protection Clause. And if they can't do that, it's hard to see how they have constitutional rights.

anyway i think the proper takeaway here is that a bare majority of the court thinks the plain words of the 14th amendment mean what they say, that four members believe there is a secret hidden meaning only recently discovered by hack lawyers

IMHO, the Supreme Court is a *bigger* problem than Trump, and it should be the primary target for reform. Trump and Congress would both be very different under a law-abiding SCOTUS, which would have stopped government action clearly animated by racism and racially gerrymandered districts.

Adam Serwer@adamserwer.bsky.social · last mo.

The new racist double standard set up by Alito in the TPS ruling: if there’s any other motive in addition to the racism, the racism doesn’t count, but if the state wants to *prevent* discrimination against black people, that is racist and unconstitutional www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/0...

The Roberts Court has been turning anti-discrimination law upside down for years. Its approach came into particular focus in May, with Louisiana v. Callais, in which it determined that not allowing Louisiana’s government to dilute Black votes was racist. In that case, Alito insisted that forcing the state to draw a second majority-Black congressional district would be an “unconstitutional racial gerrymander” because Republicans were entitled to discriminate against Black voters if they argued that their purpose was partisan instead of racist. The Court reaffirmed that position in a subsequent case dealing with Alabama, after a lower court had found ample evidence of deliberate racial discrimination, as opposed to the discriminatory effect of the Louisiana map.

Mullin now sets up an even more impossible double standard. If the government wants to discriminate against Black people, any pretext will do. “As long as there is a plausible basis—any plausible articulable basis—for the government’s action, then the Court will look to that basis as sufficient,” Aderson Francois, a law professor at Georgetown University, told me, “even in the face of evidence that government actors were motivated by animus.” If a Black person wants to prove they’ve been discriminated against, however, no amount of evidence will suffice.

Someone actually did a study a while back that showed the most effective way to get women out of TERF groups wasn’t people trying to change their minds, it was them getting literally any benign hobby, like learning other languages or taking up needlework

Patrick Wyman@patrickwyman.bsky.social · 2mo ago

You know who isn't getting radicalized? Guys who do ships in a bottle. Embrace model-building and avoid the pitfalls of right-wing extremism

while it's relatively rare for public defenders to become state supreme court justices, Minnesota's newly-named chief justice, Theodora Gaïtas, and newest associate justice, Reynaldo Aligada Jr., are both former public defenders and the children of immigrants

Walz names Theodora Gaïtas as chief justice of Minnesota Supreme Court

She will replace Natalie Hudson when Hudson retires this fall. Walz also named Reynaldo Aligada Jr. as the court’s newest associate justice.

startribune.com

After Plessy v Ferguson it was 58 years before we got a court willing to overturn it. I don’t think Black people who want to vote and women who want to have rights to their bodies and trans people who want to EXIST should have to wait that long because it offends your sense of propriety.