Guilherme Chihaya
@kchihaya.bsky.social
Sociologist at Nord University, Norway. He/him. Research interests: Residential segregation, neighbourhood inequality, sociological theory, analytical sociology. Left of the left.
If roughing up a girlfriend and locking her in a room was a virile, authentic a rejection of “smoothgroined” “HR lady” politics, but a rape is too far, then what’s at stake is not a principled rejection of violence against women but a cynical assessment of how much violence a man can get away with.
Oh its OVER OVER
I was R1 for a paper at some journal. R2 was an A-hole. They told the (British) authors to native-English edit their flawless text, berated them for citing preprints, tried to coerce citations. True R2 bingo. We should normalize refusing to review for outlets where such BS behavior is allowed.
Worth mentioning that the Borjas/Breznau paper is already making rounds and being cited by people arguing about the “right way” (read value neutral) of doing sociology: journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
Standards in sociology: A position statement at the 25th anniversary of the European Academy of Sociology - Ozan Aksoy, Gianluca Manzo, Gunn Elisabeth Birkelund, Werner Raub, 2026
In this note we outline a vision on standards for sociology. The occasion is given us by the 25th anniversary of the European Academy of Sociology (EAS), an ins...
journals.sagepub.com
There’s been a lot of buzz around the Borjas/Breznau (2026) paper (www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...) and potential ideological bias in research. We took a closer look at the data. Could there be a "bias in bias research"? Here is what we found: www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10...
The original authors have published a reply to our comment (www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10...). They applaud us for checking the robustness of social science research, yet at the same time accuse us of acting as the “replication police.” Here is how we see the story in a nutshell:
Fuck the reflecting pool. This has not gotten nearly enough coverage or generated the proper outrage. People thrown in prison for 30-50 years for the "crime" ofmaking zines and belonging to a book club!! This is straight-up totalitarian atrocity. Political prisoners thrown in a gulag to rot.
‘This is injustice’: how leftist zines were used to sentence anti-ICE protesters to decades in prison
Advocates sound alarm after zines were used as evidence to convict protesters of terrorism charges tied to 2025 protest at Texas ICE facility
theguardian.com
How does rampant #assetisation and variation in #assetmanagement affect social conflicts? Our special issue co-edited with @theobourgeron.bsky.social in New Political Economy proposes a framework to analyse such asset struggles and brings together 7 papers with key empirical studies. 🧵
Their hostility to "woke" was never about the conceptual tools, it was about who benefited from them.
DOUTHAT: Let's be honest -- the tone of the administration is not consistently a Christian tone. There is a tone of aggressive uncharity JD VANCE: Tonal arguments are ways of, frankly, policing working class ways of communication, and covering them in elite preferences
"Hur har diskussionen om jobb, inkomster och bidragsberoende kunnat domineras av mörker när utvecklingen går åt rätt håll sedan länge. Vi har gått igenom mängder av medierapportering i de här frågorna men bara undantagsvis sett exempel på journalister som gjort sitt jobb och redovisat fakta."
”Journalister borde inte nöja sig med finansministerns känslor” - Journalisten
Den 4 oktober 2025 publicerar Svenska Dagbladet en lång intervju med finansminister Elisabeth Svantesson (M). En stor del handlar om regeringens planer på...
journalisten.se
New from me: The cops who AI-enhance blurry photos to try to catch suspects are actually just tampering with evidence, lying to the public and raising the risk of wrongful arrests
Att SDs ADBO Sverige AB köpte och brann Jimmy Åkessons bok var inte det jag hade föreställt mig när jag hörde talas om nazistiska bokbål.
The “focus on the economy”-“left” would rather elect a girlfriend-abusing former PMC mercenary than question their “woke went too far,” “culture war identity politics is what made us lose touch with the masses” BS frame.
The fact that Graham Platner still holds a general election lead amid scandalous personal revelations should give us hope. Voters may be shifting to judge politicians more on their willingness to take on economic inequality and war than their private lives.
Tidöpartierna insåg att de hade opinionen mot sig om tonårsutvisningar. Så nu har de kommit överens om att kasta ut ungdomarna när de fyllt 21 i stället för 18
Claiming to be an egalitarian but supports British colonialism? Mills issue.
Stressed to the max? Chill issue
C'mon, @mdpiopenaccess.bsky.social - after all the effort sleuths put in to hunt down the papermill products, is this the best you can do? A "correction"? If you want to be taken seriously as a publisher you need to weed out the gobbledegook. pubpeer.com/publications...
PubPeer - Plants: A Key Emphasis to Its Pharmacological Potential
There are comments on PubPeer for publication: Plants: A Key Emphasis to Its Pharmacological Potential (2019)
pubpeer.com
ArXiv will quarantine you for a year if you submit AI slop, and somehow people are freaking out about having to check that their citations aren’t made up. Now call me old fashioned, but isn‘t reading what you cite and meticulously copyediting your whole manuscript part of the job description?
ArXiv to Ban Researchers for a Year if They Submit AI Slop
The change comes as arXiv and others struggle to manage an influx of AI-generated materials masquerading as rigorous science.
404media.co
My benign take is that (1) you’re not responsible for checking all of your coauthor’s citations but also (2) the new arXiv policy is totally reasonable because there should be consequences for fake citations and there’s no practical way to adjudicate multi-author cases.
I go back to this passage of the the Ezra Klein interview with @tressiemcphd.bsky.social about the alignment between message, register, audience, and medium and, I’ve gotta say, folks. Some papers out there could have been tweets.
AI psychosis is just “I really think the stripper likes me” for guys who don’t leave their house
In totally unsurprising news, Richard Dawkins is developing AI psychosis. Paywall bypass: archive.is/6RdK9
Partiet vars partiledare har 93% frånvaro fuskar med kvittningssystemet för att vinna en omröstning mitt i valåret med flera viktigare kommande omröstningar. Var det här som heter ”att kissa i byxan för att hålla sig varm?”
Martin Melin, vilken shitshow. Du sitter där när människovärdet rasar och nickar. Kan du inte ryta till när du i en timme lyssnar på en rasistisk flodvåg om somalier, “bidragsblattar” och “parasiter”, klassisk BSS-retorik? Vad är det som hindrar dig från att protestera när hat sägs i klartext? 1/3
🤷🏻♂️ Systematisk israelisk förstörelse av livsvillkor också i Libanon nu 🤷🏻♂️
good news! hungary has replaced its authoritarian racist leader with a liberal racist
AI slop has reached big scientific publishers: irisvanrooijcogsci.com/2025/08/12/a... As if it was not enough the amount of additional crap that is polluting internet searches lately… The post contains many interesting resources and links if you are interested in this topic #academicSky #eduSky
AI slop and the destruction of knowledge
This week I was looking for info on what cognitive scientists mean when they speak of ‘domain-general’ cognition. I was curious, because the nuances are relevant for something I am researching at t…
irisvanrooijcogsci.com
The fundamental asymmetry in scientific publishing today is that people can submit absolutely mind boggling crap, and face zero real costs. Unless these kinds of things are tied to substantial costs/risks, and while we rely on volunteer labor, nothing will get better.
I have lots of thoughts about this. But what I really want to know, because I'm not one: Are preprint moderators ok with their sites being used in this way? Y'all ok with folks uploading fake papers?
Although AI improves performance during assisted sessions, performance drops sharply once it's removed. And relative to controls, AI-assisted participants also gave up more frequently on test problems.
Why does this happen? Two candidate mechanisms: 1) AI resets your reference point for how long things "should" take. Unaided work suddenly feels harder than it actually is, -- a kind of hedonic adaptation. 2) AI removes the productive struggle through which you learn what you're capable of.