Kacy Manahan

@kcmanahan.bsky.social

Environmental litigator, runner, lurker. All views expressed are my own.

straight up misinformation from Politico Power Switch today: "The Clean Air Act was never designed to regulate planet-warming pollution." the definition of air pollution in the 1970 Clean Air Act deliberately mentions weather and climate, in part because carbon dioxide was known to be dangerous.

All language referring to effects on welfare includes, but is not limited to, effects on soils, water, crops, vegetation, manmade materials, animals, wildlife, weather, visibility, and climate, damage to and deterioration of property, and hazards to transportation, as well as effects on economic values and on personal comfort and well-being.

It got overshadowed by the pipeline news, but NYS’s deal to allow Greenidge Generation to keep operating an upstate gas plant *for the sole purpose of mining bitcoin* might be almost as big of a reversal gothamist.com/news/upstate...

Upstate NY Bitcoin mine agrees to slash emissions, will get air permit from the state

The move comes days after Hochul’s administration paved the way for a new natural gas pipeline in New York Harbor.

gothamist.com

Kelly Drive in Fairmount Park has been engineered to remove most pedestrian crossings and amenities, to speed up traffic. A thread with 8 examples of things that have been lost, with historical images. South to north. 1. A staircase from the river trail to the Girard Ave Bridge, and Brewerytown:

A street view image showing how there's no pedestrian crossing near a staircase that's poorly maintained.A historical image of a pedestrian path leading up to the Girard Ave Bridge.

A bit of happy news! After years of work from many people, and in response to a petition from my organization Delaware Riverkeeper Network, EPA finalized revised water quality standards for the tidal Delaware to support all life stages of aquatic life, including Atlantic Sturgeon! 🐟

epa.gov

The White House is clearly scared of the power states have to build the clean energy economy and is resorting to blatantly unconstitutional tactics. The Trump administration is hoping that pro-climate state governments back down in fear. How should states respond? Simple. Ramp up instead. 🧵

David Roberts@volts.wtf · last yr.

This new White House executive order says that the US Attorney General is going to prevent states from implementing democratically passed laws regarding climate change and clean energy. It scarcely needs stating at this point that this is wildly, unambiguously unconstitutional. Dictator shit.

If you accept that non-citizens have no right to due process, you are accepting that citizens have no right to due process. All the government has to do is claim that you are not a citizen; without due process you have no chance to prove the contrary.

Since Trump's inauguration, his EPA had announced no major step to address water or air pollution. That changed today. Trump's EPA BOASTED it plans the biggest rollback of safeguards for health, land, water & air quality in US history. To INCREASE harmful pollution to water, air, to your community.

BildBildBildBild

If you’re wondering, like I was, what’s “illegal” about DEI efforts in the eyes of the new administration, this thread is a helpful explainer.

Katie Eyer@katieeyer.bsky.social · last yr.

For those who haven't seen it, here is DOE's "Dear Colleague" letter on SFFA: www.ed.gov/media/docume.... Most concerningly, the letter states that Ed views actions taken to "increase racial diversity" as unlawful race discrimination, even when they don't treat individuals differently based on race.

I'm going to attempt to track jobs in my line of work (administrative law, litigation-y) that open up over the next stretch and post them here. Let me know if I miss something.

Carbon capture+pipes, synthetic direct air carbon capture and pipes, blue hydrogen, and non-H2 electro-fuels are all net sources of CO2 and air pollution into the atmosphere and should be eliminated in the same way fossil fuels should be eliminated. web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/j...

web.stanford.edu

Mark Z. Jacobson@mzjacobson.bsky.social · 2y ago

“Carbon capture will increase fossil fuel production, there’s no doubt about it..It does not help climate one bit.” @nytimes www.nytimes.com/2024/12/22/c...