Elizabeth Baisley

@kebaisley.bsky.social

Assistant Professor of Canadian Politics at Queen's University | LGBTQ2S+ politics, Canadian politics, and gender and politics

🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ Excited to have work with @qalbaugh.bsky.social and Kate Burke Pellizzari in this @politicsgenderj.bsky.social virtual special issue on LGBTQIA+ politics. Many of these pieces are also great for teaching, so keep in mind for updating syllabi!

Politics & Gender@politicsgenderj.bsky.social · 2mo ago

In celebration of Pride Month, our new virtual special issue highlights research on LGBTQIA+ politics 🏳️‍🌈 Enjoy free access to the articles until the end of July ⬇️

Reminder - as we watch results from NL election - that even if PCs secure more seats than Libs, John Hogan will remain Premier & would have first opportunity to test confidence of House. If PCs lead but remain below 20 seats, it's very possible we'd have a Liberal govenment continue.

📣 Excited to share a new dataset article with @qalbaugh.bsky.social in @cjps-rcsp.bsky.social! 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️ We identify 176 out LGBTQ2S+ candidates in the 2015, 2019 & 2021 Canadian federal elections using a replicable search procedure based on individual candidate searches.

Cambridge University Press Political Science & IR@cambup-polsci.cambridge.org · 10mo ago

#OpenAccess from @cjps-rcsp.bsky.social - A New Dataset Identifying LGBTQ2S+ Candidates in Canadian Federal Elections - https://cup.org/43dVFj3 - @kebaisley.bsky.social & @qalbaugh.bsky.social #FirstView

Logo of CJPS-RCSP with the hashtag OpenAccess on a blue background.

Thrilled to have a new article in PRQ in time for the end of Pride month. doi.org/10.1177/1065... It demonstrates that having 2SLGBTQI+ candidates running in an electoral district is correlated to higher turnout among 2SLGBTQI+ voters - even in a relatively accepting place like 🇨🇦. #affinityeffects.

Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

doi.org

Q

In recent work with @qalbaugh.bsky.social, we find that in 2019 and 2021 parties nominated LGBTQ2S+ candidates in districts they were over 16 percentage points less likely to win than straight cis candidates. About 2/3 of the gap is due to which parties and 1/3 is due to which districts.

Melissa R. Michelson @melissamichelson.bsky.social · last yr.

Day 10: Are LGBTQ candidates sacrificial lambs? @kebaisley.bsky.social‬ & @qalbaugh.bsky.social‬ find, well… yeah. “Wrong Place or Wrong Party? LGBTQ2S+ Candidates and District Competitiveness.” www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Still not controlling for sexuality in your turnout models? The sexuality gap in is not just statistically significant (we shouldn't just fetishise p<.05) but also *politically* significant as this top-cited paper shows Participation scholars should take it more seriously doi.org/10.1111/1475...

Bild
Michal Grahn@grahn.bsky.social · last yr.

Happy to find out that my paper Still proud at the polls belongs to #EJPR 's best cited papers of 2023. For those who missed out on the paper, I show that high levels of LGB voter mobilization do not disappear after the enactment of major LGBT+ rights. doi.org/10.1111/1475...