Koen Frenken

@kfrenken.bsky.social

Professor of Innovation Studies at Utrecht University https://www.uu.nl/staff/KFrenken PI of NWO-project on Regulating Platform Work https://platworkr.sites.uu.nl/

tl,dr; Scientists no longer allowed to use federal funding to publish, attend meetings, or talk to the public. They cannot collaborate internationally. Grants can be cancelled for any reason, at any time, political appointees have a final say over what gets funded, and who gets funded.

Science Magazine@science.org · 4mo ago

The White House today announced it plans to make major changes in how the U.S. government manages research funding. https://scim.ag/43HgW4s

𝐖𝐚𝐚𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐤𝐞𝐧 𝐣𝐨𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐞𝐧 𝐯𝐢𝐚 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐞𝐧? Samen met onderzoekers van de Universiteit Maastricht / ROA deed ik onderzoek naar dit vraagstuk. Via het YoungOnes platform vulden 1.790 freelancers onze survey in. De eerste inzichten: www.zipconomy.nl/2025/10/waar...

Bild

Nu de Eurosky er is, heb ik de stap gemaakt om hier een account aan te maken. Ik ga hier vooral over Big Tech en de democratische rechtsstaat berichten. En natuurlijk over Big Tech-waakhond The Firewall thefirewall.eu

The Firewall

The Firewall is een journalistieke waakhond die niet alleen blaft naar misstanden maar daar ook zijn tanden in zal zetten. The Firewall richt zich op Big Tech en onderzoekt de macht, invloed en impact...

thefirewall.eu

On the publication bias discourse, I regret that metascience has become a source of decontextualized, low-res, bean-counting-focused `science is in crisis' narratives. It is largely uncurious abt science, desperately lacking in theory & measurement. I'll quote a few takes I liked & add my thoughts🧵

This is a great thread on the bias in metascience itself. There is a big bias towards "its all terrible!!!!" and loads of very unrealistic assumptions. As a community we are also dismal at seeing the very dubious politics behind a lot of metascience throughout its history.

Berna Devezer@devezer.bsky.social · 8mo ago

On the publication bias discourse, I regret that metascience has become a source of decontextualized, low-res, bean-counting-focused `science is in crisis' narratives. It is largely uncurious abt science, desperately lacking in theory & measurement. I'll quote a few takes I liked & add my thoughts🧵