Ken Schultz

@kschultz.bsky.social

I am professor of political science at Stanford University and an avid nature photographer. All views are my own. More photos at https://kenschultz.smugmug.com

When you are defeated in the sense of “unable to achieve your goals” but not defeated in the sense of “unable to continue military operations” then you are perpetually “headed for defeat” until you decide to end it. That’s how you get forever wars.

In Iran, the U.S.
Appears Headed for a Strategic Defeat, Allies
Fear

What LLMs can do in science is being undersold or actively ignored by the scientific community My larger concern is that AI does seem to enhance progress and discovery for scientists who already know how to think and do science, but will it simply undermine that core ability for new generations?

NERV IRB Coordinator@professormusgrave.bsky.social · 4d ago

This is what is driving me nuts. So many posters around here keep haw-hawing about R’s in strawberry and clearly have NO idea that these are extremely powerful machines *already* that we have not yet figured out how to utilize fully. If we stopped development today, they’d still be astonishing

One of my empirical-work econ takes is that I think academia should be *more* open to publishing work based on best-we-can-do weak data, as long as there's really no other way to address the question and that work is very clear about what it can and can't actually say.

Let me tell you, having chronicled Pentagon-style war game on attacking Iran nearly 25 yr ago, every single "surprise," "darkening turn," "narrowing option," spreading warfare," "rising casualties," "no easy exit," etc that comes drip-by-drip is EXACTLY why GHWB WJC GWB OBAMA BiDEN did NOT do this

From page full of headlines about things going to hell in Iran.

Clausewitz: War is the continuation of politics by other means. Netanyahu: Politics is the continuation of war by any means. Vance: Politics means war against others. Trump: Others mean! War!!

IR 101: The primary reason for trade agreements & all the other international treaties/organizations is not really the <content> of the policies, but rather the reduction in uncertainty <about> & credible commitments <to> the policies.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 2w ago

"It's not really a trade strategy so much as a demonstration that no American commitment is durable past the next mood swing — which is its own kind of cost, distinct from whatever the tariffs themselves do to the price of Canadian whisky." — @lizdye.bsky.social

As much as it would be satisfying for Rutte to lash out at Trump, I am not sure what good it would do, and it could do real harm. The goal for NATO right now should be to hedge while avoiding (or at least delaying) full rupture. The problem isn't Rutte. It's Trump.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 4w ago

WOW -- Danish reporter *goes there* with Rutte "You sit next to Trump when he talks about conquering Greenland, lashes out at allies like Spain -- things it doesn't seem like the old Mark Rutte would approve of. Does this have any affect on your self-respect when you sit there and say nothing?"

One of the many tragedies of AI in higher education is that students think that they have to cheat and plagiarize because their peers are doing it already. In my (non-representative) sample of undergrads, 50% of them flat-out detest what AI has done to their education

Lakis Polycarpou@lpolycarpou.bsky.social · 4w ago

If you *are* there for knowledge, the incentive structure works heavily against you if it’s possible for everyone else to cheat without consequence. I suspect that most students hate this as much as their professors do.