Leran

@leran.bsky.social

Thinking a lot about humanity, anti-hunger policy, the Overton window, and what I'm going to eat next.

This is damning and exposes the whole facade of what attacks and cues to SNAP are really about. It’s not about waste, fraud, and abuse. It’s about turning people away so the government can redistribute more money to the ultra wealthy.

Food Research & Action Center@fracposts.bsky.social · 2mo ago

A SNAP payment error rate doesn't tell the whole story. CAPERs track when eligible people are wrongly denied benefits or lose assistance. As states focus on reducing errors, we can't lose sight of access. frac.org/blog/balanci...

Recipes should list active time instead of prep time. If I’m chopping in the middle of the recipe that’s still time I can’t do other things!

⚠️ The Department of Transitional Assistance (DTA) is facing a critical staffing shortage, leaving thousands of residents unable to access essential SNAP benefits.

Bild

Budgets reflect our marginal prioritization. We have limited resources, so we fund things at the expense of other things. Giving nearly $1 trillion to the military while dramatically underfunding housing aid, while leaving kids malnourished, while leaving people uninsured - it's a choice.

“wretched and vile man” who “had the blood of hundreds, even thousands, of Americans on his hands.” Takes one to know one, eh, Trump?

I don’t think Democrats should necessarily campaign on the economy. As a middle class white guy, I hear economy and I don’t think you’re talking about me. That’s for old money or finance/tech bros. Cost of living, though, now I’m listening.

G Elliott Morris@gelliottmorris.com · 7mo ago

I will repeat: It is not obvious, based on the data, that campaigning on the economy in Nov would be significantly more effective than campaigning on immigration. Gov. policy is dramatically out of step with the public on immigration/deportations, and executive overreach is a potent motivator

“…policymakers need to strengthen and fully support healthy school and child-care meal programs as a cornerstone of any effort to reduce kids’ sugar intake. With such programs reaching more than 30 million children each day, they are among the most powerful levers to shape kids’ diets.”

The real reason your children can’t avoid added sugar - The Boston Globe

New federal dietary guidelines call for children to avoid added sugar until their 11th birthday. But we’re raising children in a food environment where added sugar is almost always the default.

bostonglobe.com

How to improve diet and health for low-income Americans in 3 easy steps 1) Repeal OBBBA SNAP cuts 2) Increase SNAP benefits from the current Thrifty Food Plan to AT LEAST the Low-Cost Food Plan** 3) Fully fund food is medicine programs for Medicaid and Medicare patients

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com · 7mo ago

Brooke Rollins is still at it! "We had run almost 1,000 simulations, and between $3 and $4 is a fair number if you can have access to that food. I just saw new numbers that were run: a full day, meaning 3 full square meals and a snack, is about $15.64."

I'll leave it the experts in nutrition science to comment on the make-up of the new Dietary Guidelines for Americans, but a friendly reminder that the DGA isn't worth anything if we don't increase supports like SNAP, boost funding for child nutrition programs, raise wages, and bring down prices.

Bild

Started The Painful Truth about Hunger in America. Couldn’t agree more w @marianachilton.bsky.social: “Responsibility for hunger in America lands in wallets, laps, hearts, and minds of the wealthy, who create inequality for their own profits. To solve it, we have to focus on ending inequality.”

Bild

The shutdown was an excuse, not a reason, to go after SNAP. SNAP recipients have to re-apply either every 6 months or year. Onerous process, with almost no fraud. There are no shutdown-related requirement for SNAP renewal. But it would predictably result in low-income families going hungry.

Marcia Brown@marciabrown.bsky.social · 9mo ago

Brooke Rollins says on Newsmax SNAP participants will have to re-apply for the program. Details are still unclear. via Grace Yarrow for @politico.com www.politico.com/news/2025/11...

Aside from the fact that SNAP participants already have to periodically recertify for benefits — usually every 6 or 12 months — SNAP rules also prohibit states from arbitrarily shortening a household's certification period to force them to reapply early.

Politico@politico.com · 9mo ago

The Trump admin to require millions of low-income people to reapply for food stamps as part of an effort to crack down on “fraud," Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins said.

This spending bill is a fundamental betrayal of the people, and I voted NO. Shame on every member of Congress who voted to deny a child their medication or to tear away life-saving cancer treatment. The people deserve so much better, and this fight isn't over.

So we’ll know by Wednesday just what extreme this administration wants to take to starve people and punish states for trying to help them.

Steve Vladeck@stevevladeck.bsky.social · 9mo ago

At 11:54 p.m. ET, the First Circuit *denied* the Trump administration's request for a stay pending appeal in the SNAP case. #SCOTUS now has 48 hours (so, through 11:54 p.m. on Tuesday) to either grant the same relief or extend the "administrative stay" entered by Justice Jackson on Friday night.