@macdiehard.bsky.social

All about solving the housing and homelessness crisis. Join us at http://SeattleYIMBY.org.

The city of Seattle is going to waste 6 months “studying” the effects of not upzoning around transit stations under the guise of “equity” and “anti displacement” when they already know this actually causes and exasperates it

Bild

Blaming evil greedy developers is an easy and convenient rhetorical trick, because it’s not very popular to say you’re against providing housing to renters, working families, low-income seniors, young adults, or refugees.

Our City and region are going to continue to grow in population. We can’t stop that even if we wanted to (and that’s not what I want). So where are people going to live? Are they going to live in the City or are we going to cut down more forests and farmland to build suburban housing?

CM Eddie Lin responds to the attacks in the Seattle Times on the idea of SEPA reform in an op-ed this morning. "Dense housing, walkable neighborhoods, and safe, accessible transit is how we can finally address our affordability crisis and build a more resilient and equitable city."

Dense housing, walkable neighborhoods, and safe, accessible transit is how we can finally address our affordability crisis and build a more resilient and equitable city.But we can’t hold onto the past so tightly that we destroy our future. The negative impacts of climate change are already here, and we know they are not borne equally across our city. Health outcomes are worse for South Seattle residents due to urban heat islands, limited tree canopy and air pollution. Dense housing, walkable neighborhoods, and safe, accessible transit is how we can finally address our affordability crisis and build a more resilient and equitable city.SEPA has historically been used by a small number of businesses and neighborhood activists to protect the status quo and their special interests and slow government down, asking the city or state to do more studies. But our house is on fire, and maintaining the status quo will only make things worse. Here in deep-blue Seattle, where elected leaders are trying to take action to address climate change and our affordability crisis, build a greener and more affordable city, SEPA appeals are resulting in years of delays; time that we don’t have. We don’t need more studies — we need the political courage to act.
That’s why I’m proposing updates to our SEPA procedures to streamline the process and to stop unnecessary and redundant appeals. Tuesday, July 28, Seattle City Council is expected to vote on CB 121215, which would limit the type of SEPA appeals that can be heard by the city’s hearing examiner. I sponsored this legislation because I believe this bill will remove one of the biggest roadblocks preventing us from meaningfully addressing many of the biggest challenges facing our city: housing and homelessness, traffic safety and environmental justice. I look forward to voting on this bill and getting back to the hard work of planning for our city’s future.

New housing is ALWAYS going to be expensive for a long list of reasons including cost of labor, materials, and land. Affordable housing has always traditionally been older housing. And if you want more of that, build more market-rate new housing so people can move up.

Nobody disputes that having access to a car in a car-dominated society is good. It gives one access to jobs, healthcare, food, education, social opportunities and more. All we're asking is for people to go one step deeper and ask why access to such basic rights requires buying and operating a car.

Romeo Kokriatski@vagrantjourno.bsky.social · 3w ago

I grew up in Jackson Heights in Queens and we still had a car, and our lives got measurably better when we did.

Landlords can only get away with this stuff because NYC has a 1.4% rental vacancy rate thanks to decades of under-building new homes. Building more housing would force landlords to compete and take away their leverage to demand these invasive tenant screenings.

Post nicht verfügbar.

Both NYC’s fire (nypost.com/2025/01/05/u...) and EMS (www.ems1.com/labor-issues...) unions were very against congestion pricing without carveouts for their members (which they never got). They said it would hurt public safety and, in EMS’s case, even *tried* to make it hurt public safety.

Daniel Comeaux@danielcomeaux.bsky.social · last mo.

New NBER paper finds that the congestion zone in NYC sped up emergency responses by over a minute - about 5-6%. Great stuff! www.nber.org/papers/w35414