Megan Peiser

@meganpeiser.bsky.social

Mixed Chahta on Anishinaabe Land. Food sovereignty. Bibliographer. 18C lit. Women Writers. DH. Periodicals. Mother of dachshunds, first of her name. She/her

Being online in any/all ways is just crushing now. When I open social media/Google, I get ads trying to sell me things based on my grief, on common illnesses for my dog's breed, on the assumption that I must hate my body. A constant bombardment reminding me of sadness—all for someone else's profit.

Book history/bibliography folks—doe anyone know of a bibliography/libguide/anything else where folks have compiled revisions of Robert Darnton’s famous “Communications Circuit" diagram? I’ve seen so many over the years—I kind of want to point students to a whole batch of ‘em for a class exercise

Just a reminder that my book, British Women Writers and the Review Periodical talks about what discoveries we can make when HUMANS compile data about history, and HUMANS evaluate the messy parts of that data instead of rejecting them. www.press.jhu.edu/books/title/...

British Women Novelists and the Review Periodical

How did book reviews shape the fate of novels and their authors during the height of women's literary influence?At the turn of the nineteenth century, British women novelists were publishing more fict...

press.jhu.edu

Researchers — submit your public comment. It doesn’t need to be long or fancy. Mine emphasizes the importance of peer review by field experts for humanities work, and my concern for Indigenous communities when politics override treaty rights (eg to fair access to education/healthcare)

Karin Wulf@kawulf.bsky.social · 4w ago

Public conversation about the OMB proposal has focused on science, but make no mistake: this is about ALL research and humanities are just as vulnerable. I'm back @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social w historian & @historians.org exec director Sarah Weicksel. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/07/10/t...

I’ve been reading my way through Elizabeth Chadwick novels this summer and they are such a fun escape. Also, beefing up on my knowledge of Angevin genealogy, so that’s a bonus.

This is a brilliant assignment and I can’t wait to adapt it for my classes. Creativity, joy/humor, primary sources, genre knowledge. So much here.

Brodie Waddell@brodiewaddell.bsky.social · 4w ago

In the final week of my Microhistories module at @bbkhistorical.bsky.social, I asked students to imagine a microhistory starting with just one primary source. The results were brilliant, so follow along to hear about a bunch of books that definitely need to be written! 🗃️🧵 #Microhistories 1/?

Screenshot of the module website for 'Reading and Writing Microhistories'.

I’ve been working my way though this and reflecting on years of resisting building a website for the NRD data bc… that just isn’t useful in the long term, bibliographically. I rcvd so much push back. Glad to have smart voices to turn to in convo about this.

Heather Froehlich@heatherfro.bsky.social · 4w ago

for the afternoon crowd: If you ever wanted to hear my thoughts on digital project hosting, I am simply delighted to share a whole article of those thoughts with you www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10....

If you're an up-and-coming bibliographer, I hope you'll apply for @bibsocamer.bsky.social New Scholars Program. Apps due Sept 16. As a former New Scholar myself, I can attest to how great this program was for supporting my research! bibsocamer.org/fellowships-...

The Bibliographical Society of America

The website of the Bibliographical Society of America, a 501(c)(3) non-profit membership organization and learned Society devoted to the study of the material text.

bibsocamer.org

Here at the Oakland University Board of Trustees meeting today where they’ll vote on whether to move fwd with a planned data center on campus adjacent to the Native American Heritage Site.

today's "AI in GLAM World" story is asking OCLC if a subject heading on a children's adaptation of Robinson Crusoe that said the book was about "airplane crash survivors" was AI-generated. Reader, it was.

1) archivist using AI to generate a biographical note in the MSS finding aid for the wrong person 2) pushback on completely prohibiting AI usage in metadata/description/processing beyond transcription because "there are multiple steps of human review" 3) both of these things happening the same week

Trying to talk candidly w my honors thesis student about the many "invisible" labors of writing. Creating reading/note-taking systems, re-reading, transcribing quotes, searching for sources, checking citations, writing paragraphs out of which only one sentence is useful. I want them to feel "seen".