Mollie Gerver

@mgerver.bsky.social

Associate Professor in International Ethics at King’s College London, focusing on immigration, consent, and experimental philosophy. www.mgerver.com

The EU now allows member states to transfer migrants to third countries, including potentially Libya, where migrants held under a previous EU-Libya agreement faced enslavement and torture. This new policy, like the old, is unconscionable. www.infomigrants.net/en/post/7167...

What the new EU migrant 'return hubs' deal means in practice

The European Union has reached a deal to set up "return hubs" in third countries for people whose asylum claims have been denied. The new stricter migration rules could have significant consequences f...

infomigrants.net

www.ft.com/content/ebb7... The duke said he hosted the dinner, and would also host one with Conservatives, to raise “awareness about the protection of nature” and would support “any party that championed protection of nature.” Hmmm, I wonder what other party cares about nature.

Duke of Norfolk to host Reform UK donors as Farage seeks to widen appeal

Luncheon event at 11th-century castle comes after anti-immigration party made gains in local elections

ft.com

I’m looking for literature by philosophers distinguishing between making correct judgments and expressing these judgments. In others, people who claim that sometimes a correct judgment should not/ought not to be expressed. Any ideas?

Many people have little choice in what they devote half their waking hours to for years. And the assumption that people do have choice, combined with the fact that having less money is predictive of less choice, might be why many feel uncomfortable being asked and saying what they do for a living.

Julian Sanchez@normative.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I’ve always thought this was an extremely silly dichotomy. What is the thing you’ve chosen to devote half your waking hours to for years, if not decades? That DOES tell me who you are. A hell of a lot more than what’s your favorite sports team or whether you knit in your spare time.

“Writing is hard.” Thrilled to share that this simple idea led to a new paper in Political Analysis! Where most text methods focus on content, I test if expression is also effortful action. I find simple measures like character counts reveal attitudes and predict voting. cup.org/4cUmoXi 1/

Text as Behavior
Text as Behavior published in Political Analysis

by Omar Wasow

Abstract

Text analysis typically focuses on content—such as sentiment or topic—but expression is also a form of effortful action. Building on this insight, I propose using simple features of open-ended tasks to study text as behavior. This approach treats expression, such as writing, as cognitively, emotionally and temporally “costly” for subjects but inexpensive for researchers. I show basic statistics like the number of characters can approximate effort and significantly improve estimation of quantities of interest, including candidate choice, the probability of turning out to vote and psychological states about which a subject may not be fully aware. Further, these methods can convert nonresponse into informative data; validate survey instruments; serve as mechanism checks; be hard for a subject to “game”; work across different languages and analogize well to real-world situations. In sum, text as behavior can help address a range of issues related to quantifying attitudes and actions.

My review of @alanmanning4.bsky.social’s Why Immigration Policy is Hard, an extremely comprehensive book, covering reasons for migration, the effects of migration on high-income receiving countries, what we know about the effects of various policies, and much more.

LSE Review of Books@lsereviewofbooks.bsky.social · 3mo ago

NEW: The challenge of immigration policymaking. Alan Manning’s Why Immigration Policy is Hard @politybooks.bsky.social dissects how misleading statistics, policy failure and public perception fuel polarised immigration debates. Review by @mgerver.bsky.social @kingscollegelondon.bsky.social

“How might an eight-episode Netflix series involving a small business owner unfold as she is selected randomly to be a legislator? What would she do with her business? What team of lobbyists would suddenly descend on her…? Does she meet the…other people selected? Does she get drunk with power?“

Barry Lam@hiphination.bsky.social · 3mo ago

I've been up for six hours with jet lag, so I wrote a post lobbying political philosophers to invent and develop a new genre of fiction. If you get a Netflix deal, I want residuals. open.substack.com/pub/hiphinat...

I wonder how widespread this is? I’m a US citizen and applied for US citizenship for my daughter four years ago, which she has a right to obtain via my parents. I paid over $1,000, got a letter confirming receipt shortly after, and then nothing. I just assumed this is super widespread.

Austin Kocher, PhD@austinkocher.com · 4mo ago

The US government collected over $1 billion in immigration fees then refused to process the applications. No denials. No refunds. Just silence. This is the largest fee fraud in the history of the American immigration system. Here's what's happening. 🧵

This same policy was suggested in 2010 by the openly racist BNP, though they offered the equivalent of £78,000. Globally, money can encourage return, but usually for those facing inhumane conditions, or safe conditions at home. I’ve written about this here: repository.essex.ac.uk/23016/

Paying Refugees to Leave - Research Repository

repository.essex.ac.uk

Immigration Bot@immigrationbot.bsky.social · 5mo ago

"Danish immigration experts said a similar offer in their country has been accepted by very few migrants" — The i

There is extensive evidence that nationalists who don’t like migration in general like migrants who will contribute to improving health outcomes. Labour needs to start reading far more peer-reviewed studies on attitudes towards immigration, and not rely so heavily on its own polling.

Oliver Bullough@oliverbullough.bsky.social · 5mo ago

I'm trying to think who this idiocy is for, who would say: I wasn't going to vote Labour but now they've blocked a clearly exceptionally bright Sudanese woman from doing a postgraduate course in computational biology at Cambridge, I'm all in? www.ft.com/content/4493...