Mimrock

@mimrock.bsky.social

Real-time sentiment data from Bluesky: https://xraysocial.com

nitter.net is down. xcancel.com may go soon, too. all the respect to the folks at nitter for their services so far, but to be honest, X completely locking itself out of the web is probably a net positive for us all in the long term

Cease and desist
On 24 August 2026 cease and desist letters have been sent by X Corp. demanding a permanent takedown of Nitter instances and the project's repository.

nitter.net is offline and development has stopped for the time being. I'm seeking legal advice and won't be commenting further on the specifics for now.

Thank you to everyone who used, hosted, packaged, donated and contributed to Nitter over the past seven years.

— zedeus, 25 August 2026

The most striking thing about the alleged quote for me is the absurdity of that worldview. It is impossible to have a world where there is only one company and the governments and nothing else. In this world, governments wouldn't have any power so they didn't exist.

never gets old using a frontier AI model to autonomously complete a complex series of tasks only to then login to bluesky & see the masses declaring that what i just experienced 1st hand is actually fake and not possible it’s like they’re saying the earth is flat or the moon landing never happened

there are anti-ai arguments i am sympathetic to, but copyright infringement will never be one of them. i havent spent my whole life torrenting movies and bypassing paywalls to suddenly decide that the concept of intellectual property is anything other than a regressive lever of institutional power

A friend of mine who works at an absolutely mundane webshop as a SWE just told me that they used AI to find a loophole in their Salesforce contract (to prematurely cancel it) and are now rewriting the necessary functionality with AI. There will be losers.

Imagine someone materialized in front of you and handed you a small indestructible metal ball. They said it would explode in 60 minutes with the power of a 15-kiloton nuclear bomb. What would you do with the ball to minimize its damage? Do you think you would be able to survive?

I don't agree with people celebrating this refusal, but I read the post and I suddenly have much more sympathy for people wanting to get rid of DHH's influence on Rails. They are still naive (these forks are almost never successful), but I now understand their reasons.

Anil Dash@anildash.com · last mo.

Just in case you still use any Basecamp products, DHH is crashing out about his AI product gently pointing out that it’s bad for him to have extermination fantasies about the Roma people.

DHH tweet saying “This is why we need competition and open weights in Al. Imagine a world where only Anthropic sat as the moral arbiter of acceptable speech. Fucking ridiculous. (Grok of course did it no problem, same too with Kimi K).” when presented with his blog post using a slur about the Roma people.

Fed up with paying for Moises for two guitar sessions per month, so vibecoded a stem separator app for myself. Turns out there are surprisingly good stem separator models available for free on Hugging Face.

A screenshot of the stem separator app showing the 6 separated stems (guitar, vocals, bass, drums, piano, other) of the song Pink Floyd - Dogs

FYI you can just override gpt-5.6-sol to 372k context length in your harness despite the codex API endpoint reporting 272k context and it will work with the whole 372k as before

The educated, but anti-tech far left's attitude towards AI is so funny. They: "It's useless, a mindless stochastic parrot." AI user: "It was useful for me for Task A, Task B, etc." They: "It doesn't matter, it's evil. Like child labor." Make up your mind.

Hot take: Copyright should only protect works that are registered some way and only for 35 years at most. We can add in some protection against stealing trade secrets if the current policy is not enough (so employees can't steal code from their employers), but that's it.

Me: "Feel free to push back" Opus: "I think you should consider..." Fable: "The pushback you invited: I changed the spec and implemented the task in a different way because..."

I expect the debate about token costs will quickly shift from human vs token cost for a given feature to token cost vs business value of the feature. I can't imagine it will be economical to write or even just review big chunks of code by hand in a year.

One thing I cannot understand is how someone can be in academia and hold a belief that so obviously doesn't match reality. Is there no one around them who would call them out? Being smug about it is the cherry on top. (Missing alt text and name is not an accident)

Bild

Google might as well pivot to open weight Gemini models until it can catch up. That way it could remain a bit more relevant while gaining some goodwill and hurting Anthropic and OpenAI in the process.