Miserable Man Hating Feminist

@miserableharlot.bsky.social

Allegedly

Extremely telling detail from this WSJ piece about Platner's demise: "Women on the campaign told Platner he was being managed by advisers who treated them unfairly and didn’t value their ideas," with one telling him point-blank "Hey, you have a very sexist, misogynistic staff."

The Red Flag That Led to Graham Platner’s Implosion Was Hiding in Plain Sight

Maine’s populist Senate candidate made a costly miscalculation when he doubled down on his troubled background.

wsj.com

The desperation to avoid confronting why the bloodthirsty rapist merc composed entirely of red flags was so appealing to them, the petulant tantrums over why liberals can't elect a rapist as a treat when conservatives do it all the time, it's frothing resentment that misogyny is less tolerated now.

You can only ignore “personal red flags” as irrelevant to the political if you don’t understand that the interpersonal exercise or weaponization of power - like in telling rape victims to take responsibility, calling women “hatchet wounds,” or locking a girlfriend in a room - is itself political.

Bild

If you’ve spent the last 48 hours saying “none of the prior ‘red flags’ were relevant,” “it’s not about whose instincts were right or wrong,” or “anyone saying they were right is gross and gloating” you should be doing a lot of introspection about why you want to downplay misogyny.

Puff the Magic Hater@mskellymhayes.bsky.social · 4w ago

I know everyone is probably quite sick of discussing Platner, but I want to say that I have been thinking a lot about his infamous Reddit comments and how easy it was for some people to dismiss his victim-blaming around sexual assault.

You simply must understand: Leftist men *need* to engage in a little rape, as a treat, because it is their right. Disqualifying rapists would remove the Real Men from contention, and Real Men are the only voters and candidates who count.

NY Times Pitchbot@nytpitchbot.bsky.social · 4w ago

Analysis | Graham Platner's implosion could have a chilling effect on a future faux-working-class, Nazi-curious rapist's ability to become a United States Senator.

You can only ignore “personal red flags” as irrelevant to the political if you don’t understand that the interpersonal exercise or weaponization of power - like in telling rape victims to take responsibility, calling women “hatchet wounds,” or locking a girlfriend in a room - is itself political.

Bild

Patriarchy rewards almost all men who are accused of sexual violence while multiplying the harm felt by women who come forward. Platner’s “movement” never intended to change that. Plenty of “progressive” movements don’t, because they do not actually believe harming women is a moral wrong.

what a surprise. again, he reacted like this when the Nazi tattoo was revealed! he wasn't contrite, there was no actual acceptance or suggestion of change, it was pure entitlement and anger. All of this should have been obvious.

Bild

I actually kind of believe the likes Platner & Brett Kavanaugh when they say they have no memory of committing sexual violence. Not just because these guys were so drunk at the time, but also because committing sexual violence is so banal to them that it’s not distinct enough to be remembered.

One of the findings in my research is that there is never enough evidence to satisfy people who want to offer a perpetrator impunity. They can always dream up a new way to blame the victim—and ignore all the other damning, relevant evidence by cherry picking some small detail that shouldn’t matter.

Kat Tenbarge@kattenbarge.bsky.social · 4w ago

Trying to pick apart a woman's text messages to prove she's lying about being raped is gutter behavior. Consent can be revoked at any time and reading insinuations into text messages that the sender denies were there is ACTUAL journalistic malpractice. I would not trust a man who does this!

It's tedious to have to litigate every disclosure of sexual violence against a powerful or hell even not-powerful man in terms of "credibility" and "corroboration," when everyone knows that what's at stake is not whether the specific allegation is true but whether it matters.

Lmao. Lmfao even. Our antipathy was based on a clear pattern of behavior by a man who clearly has a tenuous relationship with morality, called women “hatchet wounds,” engaged in DV, etc. Antipathy towards a person like Graham Platner was the definition of rational even before yesterday.

Bluesky user Schade: “Turns out your antipathy was post-facto justified. It doesn’t make it any less prejudicial and irrational.”