MissBloomy

@missbloomy.bsky.social

Mumma of two who loves gaming. Views are my own

Honestly seeing this stuff actually just makes me feel worse. More and more proof gets found that the supreme court was obviously wrong. But does it matter if the government just ignore it? No matter how right we are and how much we prove it, it's never enough.

Ashleeee 🌊🪭@reactiveashley.cat · 3w ago

This is funny because Labour was so desperate to get history changed. But yes, the Blair government “allegedly” did a lot of good things, don’t let the current Labour bury it.

-Puberty-blocker ban -U-18s hormone ban -Forced detransitions -Transphobic schools “guidance” -Toilet segregation -Obstacles to social transition -Forced outing to parents -NHS “services” imposing a pathologising external agenda Any *genuine* conversion therapy ban would need to outlaw ALL of these

I wish one presenter if they had that awful Falkner on their show would ask 1 simple question. If the supreme court ruled the other way and went further with trans inclusion than previous thought. Would she have spend so as much time and effort pushing for the law to catch up. We know the answer

I wonder how many Labour MPs currently are looking at the supreme court judgement today and going "S**t if we reverse this then it shows we can also reverse FWS and our hands aren't really tied". How many minority groups does it take to grow a spine?

Well I am exhausted but least today I managed to get 1 MP (I will pretend only I asked him) to sign the EDM and have gotten several friends to write to their MPs to revoke the new code of practice. It may not be much but if we can all do it we can make some progress!

Govt has published their updated guidance following the Supreme Court judgment. As I have set out before, this new code will still lead to confusion for businesses & contains multiple legal contradictions which will see some of the worse elements of transphobia continue being aided and abetted 1/7

Bild

I mean yes. What is he bringing that's new or fresh? This poll will get worse as more people see it's just continuation. Immigration - the same Trans people - the same PR - Nothing in stone Privatisation - Vague as hell I have not seen him say what he will do different at all.

Stats for Lefties 🍉🏳️‍⚧️@leftiestats.bsky.social · 2mo ago

🚨NEW POLL | Burnham would lose GE2029 😬 { Votes | Seats } ➡️ REF: 28% | 278 (+273) 🔴 LAB: 24% | 159 (-252) 🟠 LIB: 11% | 77 (+5) 🟡 NAT: 3% | 57 (+44) 🔵 CON: 16% | 36 (-85) 🟢 GRN: 11% | 14 (+10) Via @BMGResearch, 26-28 May (+/- vs GE2024) x.com/LeftieStats/...

Image

I know I'm ranting today, but I took a long break due to potential health issues (all seem ok now) so back with some force I guess. But one thing I think that does need to be drilled into MPs. When they mention ILGA about trans people. Use the numbers for trans people. It's worse than 22nd. It's 45

One thing to add. If a Labour politician tries to pretend they haven't taken trans rights away. Let's pretend they are right and this was how the equality act was intended. It means Labour still took away trans rights in 2010. There is no scenario where Labour didn't strip trans peoples rights

What is the point of "change" with Labour. Let's get a new PM. Same as old PM. Let's get a new Health Secretary. Same as old Health Secretary. Honestly I hope Burnham loses in Makerfield. But whatever so called "left-wing" left in Labour need to actually find someone Left-wing to run for leader.

Just to say, if he's already this useless on people, brexit and other issues that have come up. Don't worry we have another few years to see how much more useless he will be before the next general election. Where is an actual Labour MP that is going for PM that won't be same or worse than prior?

Ashleigh Talbot ⛧🏳️‍⚧️@ashleigh.whatthetrans.com · 3mo ago

That's your view, is it Andy? Because it's incoherent. There is no way to implement the SC ruling and the new EHRC guidance without further marginalising an already marginalised community because that's what the ruling and guidance are for, to push trans people further out of public life.

Asked about new guidance on single sex spaces, Andy Burnham said: “I think the time has come to take the Supreme Court ruling and the guidance and implement it, but to do it in a way that protects those spaces but does not marginalise already marginalised communities, that's my view.

"My mum and dad brought me up to live and let live. I think Britain needs to get back to a more 'live and let live' approach to life, not where we're constantly arguing with each other, being judgmental about each other.

"Lets implement the guidance, but to do it in the fairest and most compassionate way possible."

He said he thought Britain had done too much of rerunning arguments. "We've got to stop arguing with each other. We've got to start by finding some common ground and start pulling together," he added.

Share

I have decided to run for the Labour party at the next G.E. Can anyone tell me what I am personally motivated to achieve (please make sure it's something I don't care about and would be willing to ignore in future and doesn't affect me). Also which minority should I vow to protect then abandon?

So can I ask, what difference will having Andy in charge instead of Starmer really make? Currently I am seeing nothing that was different to Starmer pre-election. In fact on trans issues he seems worse than pre-election Starmer (or maybe more like within a month or two from election Starmer).

My only real hope now is the green party in this country. All other parties in England are willing to throw me under a bus and say well at least it wasn't reform doing it. Greens are not perfect but at least they do fight back. Not bow down to fascists.

I share the worry of trans people at the prospect of PM Wes Streeting. At Health he ignored the voices of young trans people and restricted gender-affirming care, causing harm to a generation. It is up to Labour to choose its leader, but members must also choose a better direction on trans rights

Trans people are so often excluded from decisions made about them. I am concerned the puberty blockers trial has been paused not for clinical reasons, nor because govt listened to trans people's constructive concerns about how it will be run, but as a political decision...

So a while ago, Scotland was not allowed to have self ID as it would make another country in the United Kingdom have different rules regarding trans people compared to England. Now that Northern Ireland cannot implement FWS ruling, will England change FWS to ensure it aligns with Northern Ireland?

I've never done this but I do hope there will be some of you out there who will help a good friend of mine. He is a wonderful man who unfortunately has been dealt a bad hand in life. Please can you look at his gofundme and donate if you are able to. Thank you gofund.me/a1dd43bf3

Donate to My brothers M.S WAV vehicle fund, organized by Will Camm

Hey guys I want to know who can help me This is my brother Ben Sadly my brother has MS… Will Camm needs your support for My brothers M.S WAV vehicle fund

gofund.me

This ruling is disappointing but one thing is clear: the EHRC’s draft code of practice got the law wrong and must be changed. Women's and men's toilets can be provided on a trans-inclusive basis for customers and service users. [1/3]

Good Law Project@goodlawproject.org · 6mo ago

Today’s judgment makes one thing very clear: the reality of trans lives still goes ignored by the courts. Read Jo Maugham’s response to the crisis of empathy that’s harming the UK’s trans community – and the law 👇 https://goodlaw.social/np26