michael lascarides

@mlascarides.bsky.social

Art tinkerer, library dweller, immigrant. Thinking a lot about how to prove libraries are worth keeping around. Ōtepoti.

Can confirm that the most significant impact of AI on the cultural heritage institution I work for—BY FAR—has been the staff time and technical cost required to defend against the constant, uncoordinated, and wildly inefficient harvesting of our open data.

Alex Merz 🇺🇸🇨🇦🇺🇦@merz.bsky.social · 5h ago

#AI #LLM Something I've not seen commented on is the explosion of bot-impeding pages (e.g., via Cloudflare) that now appear before web pages load. The cumulative time waste for human users has got to be in the billions of person-hours. An immense burden imposed on everyone by the AI-bro assholes.

Regular viewers will know that I had serious doubts about the 'recovery' well before Trump decided to cause global chaos (and trading opportunities for his buddies). Suffice to say, today's unemployment data is GRIM! Let's have a look... Unemployment rate vs the guesses of clueless ghouls. [🧵 1/n]

Bild

Attacks on libraries, library staff, collections and patrons are ramping up around the world. Anti library campaigners appear to be sharing their playbooks and only need to be lucky once while library campaigners need to be lucky every single time.📚📜

The Free Speech Union having their CE and board member stand as candidates for Internet NZ and emailing their members to rank them 1 and 2 and not rank any other candidates feels like it should be more of a news story. It's antithetical to a genuine election and the democratic process.

Was in New York again last week and it struck me that a minor but possibly underrated reason for NYC’s unusually strong literary culture (compared to other US cities) is that many people’s main mode of transportation is a passive one where they intermittently lose cell service.

On top of AI brain rot, companies are proactively obliterating every trace of organizational knowledge they managed to accrue, by annual waves of mass layoffs targeting the most tenured (expensive) people.

Post nicht verfügbar.

As well as what Musical Chairs says here... Yes! Of course Government can spend money better than me! They have scale, access and resources that are totally unavailable to me which allow the value of that money to go further!

Musical Chairs@musicalchairs.bsky.social · 2w ago

Regular reminder that Govt creates new money when it spends, and deletes money when it taxes. The spending has to come first. The more Govt spend, the more money we have to pay taxes (and the more resources are appropriated by Govt ofc).

If you're in Dunedin on Friday 17 July, come along and hear me talk about how to vandalise Wikipedia.* Guaranteed amusing anecdotes, but also educational. And it's pay-what-you-want. *It would be nice if you did not actually vandalise Wikipedia. scifest.org.nz/programme/ho...

How to Vandalise Wikipedia with Mike Dickison | NZ Science Festival

Can we trust Wikipedia? How does it even work? Find out how the editable website stays reliable.

scifest.org.nz

Seriously though I was that kid who when my high school history teacher said "you have to turn in your rough draft with your final version" did the final version and then made a slightly shittier version as the "rough draft" and printed it on worse paper

📢 Latest update on the Dunedin weather. We had a higher volume of rain than predicted last night. Most of the system has held up well, but Mosgiel has been hit hard due to localised rainfall there. The Taieri Bowling Club on Wickliffe Street is open as an evacuation and Welfare Centre.

BildBild

In the stone ages I went to a training session where we were told students could only concentrate for 15 mins and this new invention - PowerPoint - would allow us to put up a captivating image. Professor of Medieval Italian was outraged: part of our job, he said, was to accustom people to boredom.

Asheesh Kapur Siddique@asheeshks.org · 2mo ago

Idea for a conference: figure out how to fund people to do humanities research using methods like sitting in archives and libraries for years reading and thinking and writing about what they find out.

When utilized in literature review, LLMs consistently 1. fail to mention female authors in female-led literatures, 2. insist that men are more influential or more heavily cited when this is contradicted by objective citation counts, and 3. attribute women’s work to hallucinated male scholars.